While I agree with the above one must remember that Edward wouldn't automatically become king if he arrived in England. Harold definately could have done it but did he really need to?
Just a thought.
While I agree with the above one must remember that Edward wouldn't automatically become king if he arrived in England. Harold definately could have done it but did he really need to?
Just a thought.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
A very good point indeed. I guess it would depend on how much support that Edward the Exile could have gathered in the south. Wasn't Harolds power base more in the north, York specifically? Then again, being a son in law of Edward the Confessor for as long as he was would have given him time to gather allies at court. The fact that he was able to gather such a large force on the march to meet Hardrada and Tostig is proof enough of his bonifides. An interesting dilemma. Does anyone know the circumstances of the Exile's death?Originally Posted by Wigferth Ironwall
Rotorgun![]()
Onasander...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.
Originally Posted by Justiciar
Anywho, yes certianly a possiblity. But, the mysterious death of Edward the Exile was most likely an inssurance policy for Harald. He probably realised there was no way he could win to battles. One against Edward and then another aganst William. But as it turned out he had to fight two anyway!![]()
#Hillary4prism
BD:TW
Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra
Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts
Bookmarks