Homegrown Terrorists

[Rodion Romanovich]

It seems that massive immigration and population mixing as a form of creating understanding between ethnical groups and fighting racism has had the opposite effect. It's tabboo to even utter a word that the immigrants should be thankful for coming to another country and getting everything payed for them without having to work, but if they come to a western country, get their lives payed by hard-working taxpayers, and then commit terrorist acts, then that's a pretty huge step from being thankful and it's IMO not too far off to ask if the fault isn't theirs for once, and isn't to be blamed on the local population for being "too racistic". I think it's clear that massive immigration doesn't help fighting racism and create understanding between ethnical, cultural and religious groups as much as a moderate immigration and aid to refugees (rather than the luxury-seeking immigrants who form the majority of current immigration, thus giving little or no room for the heavily suffering refugees) does. On the contrary, when the immigration becomes too massive and the local population are forced to take a stance of being ashamed of their culture and feeling like racists for having any culture or any desire at all that might conflict with immigrants, then it's a political suicide. Extremism (racism) isn't stopped by extremism in the other direction (self-denial and encouraging of racism towards one's own group), but by firmly staying in the middle between the two forms of extremism (being against all racism but not against anything which isn't racism), and fighting any attempt to divert from it (moral extremism, PC taboo and racism towards either of the groups). When we think it's shameful to think immigrants should be thankful for getting their lives payed so they can live in more luxury than many of the local population, and much better than our own retired living in the country, then we get this undesirable situation, where we allow anything, even terrorism, from them. On a social level, we don't even defend our right to live, but are ashamed of ourselves as a race, in a form of racism towards ourselves. And when that gives immigrants an advantage, the hatred among the local population masses grows. The local population keeps silent because of the taboo, until the hatred has grown too large. Protests should come as early as possible when there's unhappiness, or they tend to become more violent. Westerners start thinking of all arabs as terrorists and criminals, arabs start thinking of all westerners as war-mongers and worthless self-haters. The result is not desirable to anyone but weapons-factories.

The solution: 1. go against racism towards westerners in the same way as you go against racism towards other ethnicities (speeches against such racism, and using the laws of racial discrimination). 2. allow westerners to maintain their culture side by side with the immigrants, 3. western countries limiting their military actions in the middle east, 4. support muslims who are favoring a moderate islam over muslims who favor extremistic forms of islam, 5. make sure the immigrants are judged by the same law as the westerners and can get the same sentences (neither more nor less punishment), 6. send aid to countries with problems rather than encouraging massive immigration when there's a desire to help - immigrants cost a 100 times more than helping a single person in their home country, so accepting massive immigration is to kill 100 foreigners per immigrant, 7. make sure refugees constitute the majority of the immigration and firmly repel immigration of people who live well in their home countries but just seek luxury or protection against the law, 8. limit immigration so that the local population always remain a clear majority to ensure the local political ideology is preserved - we can't have all countries in the world having the same politics so it's necessary to preserve the ideological diversity so that it's possible to find a country to flee to if you dislike the politics of the local country (if the immigrants generally get more children than the local population it might be necessary to create laws against more than say 3 children per couple, or make sure the aid given to immigrant families is so small that they, just like most local families, are unable to have more than just a few children - so that the ideological diversity is maintained), 9. make sure the immigrants are so few and so diluted that they are integrated and are more likely to accept the local ideology so that ideological diversity is preserved.