No they weren't. I'll give you a clue. One of the names in my sig will help. Here's another name, Proudhon. How about one of the members of the boyars, named Peter Kropotkin? I can forgive your misunderstanding. Education in the USA is focused on oversimplifications. In the case of communism, that means talking about - at best, and rarely even that - Marx. Just because he wrote a book called the
Communist Manifesto doesn't mean he invented communism. That's almost like saying that because Julia Child wrote books about cooking and with cooking in the title, she invented cooking. Silly notion, really. Lenin took communism and invented what he called "war communism" which further refined Marx's statist communism. Here's another clue. Statist communism, a la Marx, isn't the only kind. Then after Lenin, Stalin took what was barely communism, Lenin's "war communism" as such, and turned it into what was essentially centrally-controlled planned capitalism and totalitarianism under the name of communism. And Stalin's communism is no more communism than the People's Republic of China is a republic.
For a few other names, should you actually wish to extinguish the limited scope of what appears to be your concept of the history of communism. Look up the comte de Saint-Simon (who died when Marx was only 7) or Charles Fourier(who died when Marx was only 18).
Things like this are why I get a little peeved at quotes like the one in your sig. Understand communism? Really? It's not personal, though. I still have hope that your mind is open, like a parachute.

Bookmarks