In my recent English expert early GA campaign, I have decided to change the path I was on. I was attacking some neighbors and decided to disband my mercs and end my raids to avoid excommunication by the pope.
But I got annoyed when a crusade came through sucking away some of my guys. I am thinking now instead to go back to the year 1129 and stop the crusade coming through Tolouse, 'allowing' the Spanish to attack me and probably bring on an excom. I will reinforce with new mercs who are available, and whip them when they arrive, and then attack the adjacent provinces to clear some adjacent areas of their buildings and raise more cash for my empire.
Now since I have a merc group with a 8 star general currently razing Venice, I will probably swing down to attack the pope and raze his lands! I'm also thinking this will be more profitable and allow me to keep building up my regular army as well as building up my infrastrucutre and my farming and mines.
Currently I have very little trade going on, so I am not worried about losing that income. I know I have seen other threads for dealing with the Pope, but how often is that your main strategy, using excom status as a way to justify razing your nieghbors. In addition, since my neighbors will probably heed the call to oust the heathens (me), I will get a chance to defend and whittle down my neighbors' armies, thus reducing some of my own upkeep through my losses, though I feel this will be more than offset by the victories I achieve.
I know, odd strategy for a GA campaign, but so far it has been working, and I plan to retain Venice as well a foothold near the pope. It unfortunately is cut off from me by rebel held Provance, but I can probably retake this later easily enough.
What do you think? As I mentioned earlier, I have won expert campaigns using little trade, though I know trade income can soar, but it is fickle when you are at war with your neighbors, which seems to be my 'hobby' in this campaign.
Bookmarks