Results 1 to 30 of 128

Thread: A REALLY Interesting Preview Of M2TW

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: A REALLY Interesting Preview Of M2TW

    Quote Originally Posted by screwtype
    Basically, as I recall, every turn represents two years of time but characters will only age one year every two turns - so basically they live four times longer than they ought to.

    Yes, it's anomalous, but the idea is that since turns aren't numbered by years, you won't notice it.
    When it comes to the point that CA hides a crucial part of the gameplay so that we won't notice the flaws in the new system, something has gone very badly wrong...

  2. #2
    Ricardus Insanusaum Member Bob the Insane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: A REALLY Interesting Preview Of M2TW

    Hopefully it will all be moddable... Though the aging of generals could easily be hard coded item. Still it is hard to be overly critical until you actually see it in action...

  3. #3
    AO Viking's Tactician Member Lucjan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,049

    Default Re: A REALLY Interesting Preview Of M2TW

    Quote Originally Posted by Perplexed
    When it comes to the point that CA hides a crucial part of the gameplay so that we won't notice the flaws in the new system, something has gone very badly wrong...
    I would hardly call the aging of generals a crucial part of the gameplay if the passage of turns won't be relative to time anyway. It's a trivial problem, albeit I am a little concerned as to what purpose this serves, but it remains trivial. And I highly doubt they would let it go unmoddable.

  4. #4

    Default Re: A REALLY Interesting Preview Of M2TW

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucjan
    I would hardly call the aging of generals a crucial part of the gameplay if the passage of turns won't be relative to time anyway. It's a trivial problem, albeit I am a little concerned as to what purpose this serves, but it remains trivial. And I highly doubt they would let it go unmoddable.
    If they're not going to indicate the year at all () then I suppose it doesn't matter that much. However, it seems strange that in a supposedly historical game in which the starting year and the ending year are clearly indentified, that the year would not be shown...
    Last edited by Perplexed; 07-19-2006 at 05:04.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO