Quote Originally Posted by x-dANGEr
You seem to see a little bit beyond words, even when I put nothing there.
Maybe, maybe not - but be careful of making such claims when your just as guilty of doing such.

Not really. What was this point about again?
Another quibble

No I don't. But you were claiming that I am a part of that cannon fodder, which I don't agree too.
Did I make such a claim?

or did you assume that I was speaking directly of you?

Oh, the Iran thing lol.. I take it you don't believe them do you? Since you say "claiming".. Good.
Until the evidence is confirmed its only a claim. The explosive residue will determine if the missile was from Iran or if it was just a rocket made by Hezabollah.

Now there is evidence the missiles being used to strike Haifa are of Iran design and manafacture. Both by the claims of Hezabolla itself - they released that they were firing Raad 1, Raad 2, and Raad 3. The picture shown in the newscaste is one that looks very similiar to the Shinian 1 (Spelling) missile of Iran design and manafacture.

No I musn't. I'm talking about the trades, not their creditibility (Israel)
Are you attempting to change what you stated to mean something else, because you misunderstood my comment? The issue that I was mentioning in that comment was information, not just trades.

You're incorrect. I tried to simplfy it so you can make out for your understanding failure.
A quibble it is indeed - the error was yours and attempts to change it are only quibbles. You made an attempt at rivisioning history and you were called on it. Any explanation otherwise is only a quibble, and flys in the face of what you stated.

No I don't. (I don't know what "refutation" means)
Then look it up -

I didn't know for sure who was it..
That is a common mistake that you are making in this thread - emotional appeal is its own refutation.

At any cost, I stand corrected. But, this still poses an asnwer to you:
FAS provides that answer - if you stand corrected by the document that it was not the UK, you should of seen where FAS provides the answer concerning the nation that provided the base assistance for Israel's development of nuclear weapons. It also clearly states what nation failed to request any enforcement concerning Israel's violation of the Non Profliation Agreements.

I am not going to educate you on the nation - but I will point you in the correct direction by refering you to the FAS website once again. If I just tell you, you will not discover for yourself that you have fallen victim to false information and propaganda of both sides.