I sympathize with Weinstein's son, and I'm saddened by the bigotry he experienced. I'm appalled at the ignorance that leads to anti-Semitism. But I don't agree with Weinstein's lawsuit; he seems to be targetting the wrong enemy. I disagree with any rules that curtail the freedom to share of one's faith in a peaceful, non-coercive way.

Anti-Semitism, or hatred directed towards people of any race, faith, etc., is a great evil. But the best way to combat it is through education, not by selectively banning certain forms of free speech. I can tell my co-workers my opinions on politics, sports, music, or anything else. I can invite them to concerts, sporting events, or private parties. So why should I be denied the right to tell them my views on God, or to invite them to church? They can tell me "no" and even ask me not to speak to them about it again, and I'll respect that.

And by the way, favoritism will happen to some degree whenever there is a majority/minority split. If I (an American) went to, say, a German university, I wouldn't expect to be included in things to the same degree as the German students. I wouldn't consider this deliberate or wrong - I'd simply have less in common with the others. Of course, if the others attacked me or shouted racial slurs, it would be a different story.