Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: middle east updates (part 2)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    karoshi Senior Member solypsist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    New York New York
    Posts
    9,020

    Default middle east updates (part 2)

    So we've got Israel attacking Lebanon. Israel attacking Palestine. Hezbollah attacking Israel. Palestinians attacking Israel. Israel threatening to attack Syria and Iran. Iran meddling in Iraq. The US meddling in Iraq. Lots of terrorists and insurgents targetting the US. The US threatening Iran. Sunnis attacking Shiites. Shiites attacking Sunnis. The US and NATO fighting a resurgant Taliban in Afghanistan. Kurds attacking Turks.

    And now, as predicted back when this whole mess was brewing, Turkey threatens to invade Iraq.

    Turkish officials signaled Tuesday they are prepared to send the army into northern Iraq if U.S. and Iraqi forces do not take steps to combat Turkish Kurdish guerrillas there _ a move that could put Turkey on a collision course with the United States.

    Turkey is facing increasing domestic pressure to act after 15 soldiers, police and guards were killed fighting the guerrillas in southeastern Turkey in the past week.


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071800823.html

    have a good week!

  2. #2
    Enlightened Despot Member Vladimir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In ur nun, causing a bloody schism!
    Posts
    7,906

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    And?


    Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
    How do you motivate your employees? Waterboarding, of course.
    Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pinten
    Down with dried flowers!
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  3. #3
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)



    Yup, it's a mess over there. Has been for years. Will be for years. The sooner we get the oil out and let them sink back into the dark ages the better.

    Roll on alternative energy! Break the petrolium strangle hold!

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  4. #4
    Boy's Guard Senior Member LeftEyeNine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Yozgat
    Posts
    5,168

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Oh well, Turkish army going over borders is unavoidable. The latest murders have been "the last drops spilling over the full cup". One of my friend has been drafted as commando a year ago, and he had informed me that the operation was a long planned one, counts for around 6 months or more. The invasion is told to be longing towards Mt. Kandil (sorry I couldn't find a map), and aims to total destruction of all PKK camp concentrations over the mountains.

    We are in the mud, anyway.

  5. #5

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    I wonder if Turkey will bomb Baghdad airpot and the docks on the Shatt .
    It is their right as a soverign nation isn't it

    The middle-east , don't ya just love it .

    And now, as predicted back when this whole mess was brewing, Turkey threatens to invade Iraq.

    I see the temptation there to rub the pro-war crowds faces in it Soly .
    But Turkey is already in Iraq , they have been for about 15 years , and for around 10 of those years they were also bombing Iraq regularly , so it is really nothing new .

  6. #6
    Yesdachi swallowed by Jaguar! Member yesdachi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    2,454

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Turkey should be offering more support and working in conjunction with the US and Iraq forces to quell these guerrillas. IF they don’t get any support from the US or Iraq then they should send in their army. GO TURKEY!

    IMO it is the US and Iraq’s responsibility to keep the actions in Iraq under control.
    Peace in Europe will never stay, because I play Medieval II Total War every day. ~YesDachi

  7. #7

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    The turkish army sent against US forces would be - pardon the pun - a turkey shoot.

    Unless they send some sort of guerilla force, a standing, organized army is red meat for the US armed forces.

    But hey, if the turks want annihilation a la the Iraqi army circa 1991, go for it.

  8. #8
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Quote Originally Posted by PanzerJager
    The turkish army sent against US forces would be - pardon the pun - a turkey shoot.

    Unless they send some sort of guerilla force, a standing, organized army is red meat for the US armed forces.

    But hey, if the turks want annihilation a la the Iraqi army circa 1991, go for it.
    If the Turks want to be mischievous, they could invoke article 5 of the NATO treaty and force the US to choose between its Kurdish clients or its Turkish allies. If Turkey can make it stick, I believe the US is legally obliged to join its side, especially after the Turks kept their part of the treaty in the aftermath of 9/11.

  9. #9

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Unless they send some sort of guerilla force, a standing, organized army is red meat for the US armed forces.

    Really Panzer , and where exactly would these US forces be able to deploy from ?
    I can see why you like the Third Reich so much , you are a military genius who is on par with its leader .

  10. #10
    Senior Member Senior Member Yeti Sports 1.5 Champion, Snowboard Slalom Champion, Monkey Jump Champion, Mosquito Kill Champion Csargo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Vote:Sasaki
    Posts
    13,331

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman
    Really Panzer , and where exactly would these US forces be able to deploy from ?
    Last time I checked the US was already in Iraq. You should really think before you speak.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sooh View Post
    I wonder if I can make Csargo cry harder by doing everyone but his ISO.

  11. #11
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Quote Originally Posted by PanzerJager
    The turkish army sent against US forces would be - pardon the pun - a turkey shoot.

    Unless they send some sort of guerilla force, a standing, organized army is red meat for the US armed forces.

    But hey, if the turks want annihilation a la the Iraqi army circa 1991, go for it.
    If you want to stage Gallopolli II its your choice. Just don't think Australia will be suckered into a second such disaster.
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

  12. #12

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Really Panzer , and where exactly would these US forces be able to deploy from ?
    Why Tribesbibble, they are already there.

    If you want to stage Gallopolli II its your choice. Just don't think Australia will be suckered into a second such disaster.
    I did not suggest an invasion of Turkey, only that any invasion into Iraq by a turkish army would be crushed.

  13. #13
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Quote Originally Posted by PanzerJager
    Why Tribesbibble, they are already there.

    I did not suggest an invasion of Turkey, only that any invasion into Iraq by a turkish army would be crushed.
    By whom? Their American allies?

    Remember that Turkey is a US ally within NATO. Remember article 5 of the Washington treaty that treats an attack on any member of NATO as an attack on all members of NATO. Remember that Turkey discharged their duties per the alliance when they sent troops to Afghanistan after the article was invoked for the only time in its history for the 9/11 attacks. Remember the US has given its full backing to Israel for similarly retaliating against attacks on its sovereign territory (invading Lebanon to boot).

    If you are suggesting that US forces be used to crush Turkish forces sent into Iraq, you are suggesting extreme treachery, a war against a formal ally. Don't expect anyone to believe a word you say after that, and don't be surprised if your other allies hurriedly seek alliances elsewhere with countries they can better trust.

  14. #14

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pannonian
    By whom? Their American allies?

    Remember that Turkey is a US ally within NATO. Remember article 5 of the Washington treaty that treats an attack on any member of NATO as an attack on all members of NATO. Remember that Turkey discharged their duties per the alliance when they sent troops to Afghanistan after the article was invoked for the only time in its history for the 9/11 attacks. Remember the US has given its full backing to Israel for similarly retaliating against attacks on its sovereign territory (invading Lebanon to boot).

    If you are suggesting that US forces be used to crush Turkish forces sent into Iraq, you are suggesting extreme treachery, a war against a formal ally. Don't expect anyone to believe a word you say after that, and don't be surprised if your other allies hurriedly seek alliances elsewhere with countries they can better trust.

    Turkey, sending troops to invade a nation already occupied by the United States, would be the treacherous party, unless an agreement to work together or avoid each other was reached.

    I think US allies would see the situation in that light as well.

  15. #15

    Default Re: middle east updates (part 2)

    Last time I checked the US was already in Iraq. You should really think before you speak.
    Yes csar , but they have their hands full at the moment , they are not in the North in any numbers and no way would the Iranian backed majority government give permission .
    Besides which could you possibly see congress giving backing to any action against one of your allies in a fight against terrorists that are on your governments list of nasty groups .
    So it is you who should think young man .

    Tribesbibble
    Thats a very good one Panzer , did you get someone to help you with that or did you manage all by yourself , you really are a clever boy .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO