Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Red Peasant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Scouser at Oxford
    Posts
    2,179

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    I was put off by the very first claims in the article, which are rubbish. The Macedonians were not excluded from the Olympic Games for so long because the Greeks thought they were too big, scary or strong, but because they were not considered to be Hellenes . The royal family eventually got round this by claiming that they were descended from some people from Argos, which was probably a spurious connection but they used their political and financial clout at the time (i.e. they greased a few palms) to get their entry rubber-stamped.
    Last edited by Red Peasant; 07-26-2006 at 19:44.
    Dum spiro spero

    A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging their prejudices.
    - William James

  2. #2
    Awaiting the Rapture Member rotorgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore Toto....
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    An impressive collection of artifacts all the same. I wish they might have dwelled on them a bit more in the short videos provided. More and more is being discovered each year which sheds light on the History of Macedonia during the 4th century BC. Fascinating!
    Rotorgun
    ...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
    Onasander

    Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.

  3. #3
    Member Member Avicenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Terra, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, somewhere in this universe.
    Posts
    2,746

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    I pity these people who know nothing about history, yet spout rubbish. It only serves to ridicule themselves.

    Let's take a look at some rubbish claims by the guy:
    - Hellenes didn't allow them because they were too strong, since they were descendants of Zeus.
    Read RP's post. Anyway, Alexander's the descendant of Zeus, not all of Macedonia. The Spartans are as well.
    - Macedonia was the first world empire
    Achaemenid Empire anyone?
    - Alexander was a conqueror before Philip's death
    Philip did the conquering, Alexander served under, or at most, alongside him.
    - He enabled Iran+Iraq+Egypt to live together in abundance
    Right, conquering the people and wiping out lots of their young men is sure abundance. I'm pretty certain that they'd be in a better condition under the Persians. Anyhow, they soon split into Selucid+Ptolemaic.
    Last edited by Avicenna; 07-27-2006 at 12:19.
    Student by day, bacon-eating narwhal by night (specifically midnight)

  4. #4
    Awaiting the Rapture Member rotorgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore Toto....
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiberius
    I pity these people who know nothing about history, yet spout rubbish. It only serves to ridicule themselves.

    Let's take a look at some rubbish claims by the guy:
    - Hellenes didn't allow them because they were too strong, since they were descendants of Zeus.
    Read RP's post. Anyway, Alexander's the descendant of Zeus, not all of Macedonia. The Spartans are as well.
    - Macedonia was the first world empire
    Achaemenid Empire anyone?
    - Alexander was a conqueror before Philip's death
    Philip did the conquering, Alexander served under, or at most, alongside him.
    - He enabled Iran+Iraq+Egypt to live together in abundance
    Right, conquering the people and wiping out lots of their young men is sure abundance. I'm pretty certain that they'd be in a better condition under the Persians. Anyhow, they soon split into Selucid+Ptolemaic.
    Oh I quite agree with you Tiberius. I didn't mean to imply that I took any of this man's claims seriously, but that he did have some impressive artifacts. It is a shame that he is such a poor student of his main object of study. I suspect that he is driven by some political agenda which moves him to draw such absurd conclusions. This is to say nothing of this Richard Bang fellow, who seems to be a sort of sycophant to Mr. Pasko Kuzman. I wonder if there isn't some romantic connection between them?
    Last edited by rotorgun; 07-30-2006 at 04:32.
    Rotorgun
    ...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
    Onasander

    Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.

  5. #5
    Member Member Seleukos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Alexander's birthplace
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Peasant
    The Macedonians were not excluded from the Olympic Games for so long because the Greeks thought they were too big, scary or strong, but because they were not considered to be Hellenes .
    1)So long? The establishment of the Macedonian kingdom doesnt go before 650 BC.Then it was a small area including Emathia-some 1/10 or even less of modern Greek Macedonia (!)
    The first Macedon King who took place in the Olypmic games was Alexander I -after 490.-the one who made Macedonia a real kingdom.

    2)I wont get into this debate again.

    3)The article is funny.
    Its headline : Lake Ohrid 360 BC -In fact the Illyrians have captured this region at this time ,as well as upper Macedonia (modern Western Macedonia/Greece) and after a couple of years crushed Macedonian army of Perdikkas II,brother of Philip II.
    Only after 356, lake Ohrid was reconquered by Philip II.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    Quote Originally Posted by Seleukos
    1)So long? The establishment of the Macedonian kingdom doesnt go before 650 BC.Then it was a small area including Emathia-some 1/10 or even less of modern Greek Macedonia (!)
    The first Macedon King who took place in the Olypmic games was Alexander I -after 490.-the one who made Macedonia a real kingdom.

    2)I wont get into this debate again.

    3)The article is funny.
    Its headline : Lake Ohrid 360 BC -In fact the Illyrians have captured this region at this time ,as well as upper Macedonia (modern Western Macedonia/Greece) and after a couple of years crushed Macedonian army of Perdikkas II,brother of Philip II.
    Only after 356, lake Ohrid was reconquered by Philip II.
    Ahhhhhhh Macedonia is not greece its just macedonia why cant you people understand that
    There Can Only Be WAR!!!!!
    I bid You Stand Men of the west

    this is my army

  7. #7
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    Quote Originally Posted by Supreme Shogun
    Ahhhhhhh Macedonia is not greece its just macedonia why cant you people understand that
    Which Macedonia are you talking about?

    Ancient Makedon? Or the modern FYROM?

  8. #8

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    modern
    There Can Only Be WAR!!!!!
    I bid You Stand Men of the west

    this is my army

  9. #9
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    Quote Originally Posted by Supreme Shogun
    modern
    Well, that is obvious enough. They are two seperate countries and, if my impression is correct, hate each other's guts.

    But the article in this thread is factually false. Modern FYROM has much less to do with the ancient Macedonian Empire than, say, Islamic Egypt to the Pharaohs. The region went through so many frequent, turbulent, and massive upheavals throughout history that the region is now far more Slavic culturally and ethnically than, say, Doric. That doesn't mean they can't make Alexander their National Hero if they want to, though.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Macedonia article, its archaeological..nothing to do with politics

    it is proven the macedonins today are descednt from alexanders macedions
    There Can Only Be WAR!!!!!
    I bid You Stand Men of the west

    this is my army

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO