Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Indian Nuclear Program

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #32
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Indian Nuclear Program

    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
    Plus, rationality doesn't seem to afflict our friends in North Korea. If that regime was about to be overthrown, I could see them launching nuclear weapons just for the fun of it, to take a bunch of people with them.

    Western Democracies tend not to fall into that mindset.
    Much as I dislike countries such as North Korea, it makes no sense to accuse them of such a lack of rationality. If the people in charge were so irrational I'd find it hard to imagine them staying in power for so long. Were such a strike to happen, it would be coldly calculated murder, not irrational.

    Stating that Western democracies don't fall in that mindset is absurd. Whereas North Korea is constantly facing the threat of a large military force, having it's leadership removed as a consequence, and essentially have their back to the wall, no western nation is in that situation (aside from perhaps Israel). Were say France in such a situation I could well imagine nukes being used as a threat, and perhaps also used.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
    Uh, so what?
    Money can better be invested in building up a decent infrastructure to supply the needy with electricity.

    That said, more reliable power to the cities of India is important if they want economic growth.
    Quote Originally Posted by macsen rufus
    Which nation ahd a "first strike" nuclear policy during the Cold War?? Any guesses?
    US, but that means nothing. Although the USSR stated they would never launch a first strike, who knows what their actual strategy was. All this says is how much more open the US were about their (nuclear) policies.
    Last edited by Geoffrey S; 07-27-2006 at 11:25.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO