
Originally Posted by
Don Corleone
You may hold that making an exception for the life of the mother is a compromise. I might. Others may. It might even be a majority (but I don't think it is). But, at the end of the day, the congressman from whom you are soliciting a vote doesn't care what the rest of America thinks. He has to care what his particular voters think.
What would be a compromise on the partial birth abortion ban? Hmmm, how about federally funded inner city clinics? What about providing free contraception at hospitals? Take steps to reduce the demand for abortion?
Or, why limit it to just this issue. Maybe said Democrat is willing to trade for a relaxation in terms on an upcoming labor bill, one that will require fully funded pensions to provide documentation to prove they are fully funded. Hey, you yourself might even support something like that.
My point is, politics is all horsetrading. You can't sit there and say "I've got 54 senators and I've got 225 reps, so you have to do whatever i say". It doesn't work that way. Our laws are setup explicitly to prevent that sort of thing from happening. So, even when you have the majority, you still have to work with the other side. Refusing to is as bad as never working towards your agenda in the first place, because in the end, the result is the same.
Bookmarks