Results 1 to 30 of 34

Thread: Normal Vs Hard/VH difficulty

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Member Member WarMachine420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    88

    Default Re: Normal Vs Hard/VH difficulty

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke John
    Ironic how you accused screwtype for talking for everybody else, while you are doing the same here and also stating as a fact. This community (the Org) is probably not larger than 1000 people and you can bet on it there are more than 1 having issues with these stat boosts.



    But I certainly wouldn't like to see a dumber AI on medium difficulty. Although it probably would be fighting better if it didn't try to do "intelligent" things like flanking or any attempt to outmanouevre the human player. The AI should alway do it's best on all levels. It would better if the AI got increases in ammo and a smaller fatigue rate. These kind of bonuses gives the AI an advantage without drastically changing the gameplay; I mean cavalry suddenly destroying a phalanx and peasants not routing when under attack by cavalry doesn't make sense, that is just bad design.
    Looks like that post addressed me first and then everyone else. I'm not understanding why.

    Look...I'm trying to be civil with a couple of you and follow forum guidelines but now you're hopping on here coming to some morons defense. He made a statement which didn't sit right with a few people. Instead of admitting that he made a mistake, he argued. Then argued some more. Why would you defend that? Why would you defend ANYTHING that has NOTHING to do with YOU?

    Mind your own business. When you make a mistake, I assure you I'll jump all over it (promise...even if it's in 3 months) and then you can debate it with me all you want. Until then, it looks very "corny" (we'll leave it at that) to rush to the defense of someone who's not your wife.

    Duke, you're another one with almost 3,000 posts. If you are spending any comparable amount of time in game, you're NEVER going to get a challenge. They can't guarantee a challenge for a person who spends half their life playing the game. There's no way.

    It's also interesting how you first told me that he didn't address multiple parties, then when I wrote why in actuality he DID, you didn't respond. You pointed a finger at me instead. That certainly doesn't look good. A bit immature perhaps. When someone proves something you said wrong, you address it...you don't hide.

    I made a statement that was OBVIOUSLY not meant to be taken literally. If you think I have figures that prove undeniably that 99.9 percent of the community doesn't care or won't notice, you're crazy. The point was that people with 3,000+ posts should probably realize that spending HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of hours talking about the game and playing it...is going to make the game easier over time. You act as if the game was so easy, that on NO difficulty could gamers as a whole find a challenge...and this is not the case. I would bet you 20 grand that the MAJORITY of gamers who played RTW were challenged. Then again, that same majority doesn't have 3000 posts on a forum for the game, nor do they spend 40+ hours a week playing. Nothing wrong with this behavior but it does give a little insight into why the game may have become unchallenging for you.
    Last edited by WarMachine420; 08-16-2006 at 16:00.
    One Word: Chariots

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO