Syria

[Aenlic]

Calling someone a Nazi and infering someone is a Nazi is identical. I am only advocating police work that utlizes the available information. I just listed a whole host of folks who don't meet the criteria. Why did you happen to conveniently ignore that?

EDIT:

JimBob: Target all four men in the top picture and the two dark-haired men on the bottom pic. I'm not talking anal probe. Just extra attention.

You edited your post after I posted, Eclectic. So let's examine your edit, as well.

Edit: And for the record: They ain't Japanese, rarely are they black, certainly not maori, not Chinese, etc.

Look, when CHECHEN rebels (Whom are white if I recall) start blowing our planes up, then I would say target whitey cracker nilla milk too.

For the first part of that edit:

I expect you would be unable to tell the difference, on appearance alone, between an Indonesian Muslim and others from Southeast Asia.

The man in the middle in this pic is a suspected Indonesian terrorist. Except for his beard, he appears Asian to me. He's also suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda. He's also an Islamist fundamentalist.



Now, as for the second part of your edit:

So you're saying that the only criteria for being a target of your profiling is blowing something of ours up?

And yet, you give this guy and the whites/anglos who look like him a pass. Why is that? He actually did a bombing and killed people.







So, in spite of the obvious evidence of light-skinned, fair-haired terrorists, you insist that the only people who need to be profiled are "brown" people, probably with dark hair, and yet not Asians (also, in spite of evidence of Asians who are even suspected of being tied to Al Qaeda).

Sorry, Eclectic. If the shoe fits still holds.