Quote Originally Posted by Navaros
Scientific method is not and cannot be applied to evolution because it does not meet the requirements of the scientific method. Ie: not testable, not repeatable, not observable etc. etc.

Those "peer reviews" you speak of don't mean much since all those peers are stuck in their fundamentalist zealot mindset. This is why the history of the theory of evolution is filled with many tangible examples of outright hoaxes and fraud committed by scientists themselves, and which were gleefully accepted by those "peer review" you mention.
Have you read:
Quote Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
Also about the fruit flies - scientists have been able to alter the populations of fruit flies so that they change properties in many ways, according to which fruit flies reproduce and which aren't. That's a pretty good proof of evolution. Another good proof of evolution and genetics is how most children look so much like their parents. Try to explain all those things with creationism.
This might also be an intresting article for those that haven't read it:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...evolution.html

So it is observable not only by modern signs of evolution but also with the use of fossils. Not repeatable? Wth? what part of the theory don't you understand? not testable? yes it is ook at what Legio posted. So there goes your argument.
And here comes mine. Scientific Method.