Best difficulty setting for a rtw newbie?

[econ21]

I'd start with medium. I always like medium battles in TW because it gives you "fair" historical match-ups on the battlefield - their men will only outfight yours if they are superior etc.

I forget the details in MTW, but "hard" gives a fairly subtle edge to the AI on the battlefield. "Expert" is a bit more blatant, but not as much as RTWs VH battles.

I don't recall the strategic situation varyingly markedly by the difficulty level: you get less cash to start with but from what I remember, it did not feel that the AI treasure chest varied that much (unlike in RTW VH campaigns).

In my opinion, the Risk-type map of MTW (and STW) can make the AI much more competitive than in RTW. So I would try it on medium and bump up the difficulty level on later campaigns depending on how you find it.

[Zimfan]

I'd start with medium. I always like medium battles in TW because it gives you "fair" historical match-ups on the battlefield - their men will only outfight yours if they are superior etc.

I forget the details in MTW, but "hard" gives a fairly subtle edge to the AI on the battlefield. "Expert" is a bit more blatant, but not as much as RTWs VH battles.

I don't recall the strategic situation varyingly markedly by the difficulty level: you get less cash to start with but from what I remember, it did not feel that the AI treasure chest varied that much (unlike in RTW VH campaigns).

In my opinion, the Risk-type map of MTW (and STW) can make the AI much more competitive than in RTW. So I would try it on medium and bump up the difficulty level on later campaigns depending on how you find it.

I'll try it on normal, then. I prefer a level playing field battlewise too. It seems to make the battles more realistic, and I'm not so great at the games that the battles aren't challenging. I was mostly worried about the ai on the strategic map.

Well tomorrow we shall see if the Danes can conquer the world!

[Martok]

econ21 is correct. Choosing between Normal and Hard isn't really going to affect how agressive the AI is on the campaign map. It would be different if you were playing on Easy (the AI is generally more passive), but obviously you needn't worry about that in your case.

Good luck, Zimfan; may the world come to fear the might of the Danes once more!

[Zimfan]

Thanks for the advice, guys! As my first non Viking era campaign, I'll be focusing mainly on playing, and not taking too many notes or screenshots, but I'll try to take enough to For the mtw empire history/screenshots thread.

While I'm asking newbish questions, could someone tell me what infrastructure to build to get huscarls. I read here that the Danes get them in early and want to pump out as many as possible before late.

[Martok]

I don't remember the exact requirements for Huscarles, but I believe you need a Spearmakers Workshop and Swordsmith. In addition, I'm pretty certain you need an Armourer as well.

At the very least, make sure you've built a Spearmaker and also upgraded your stronghold to a Keep so you can build the Spearmakers Workshop and Swordsmith.

[econ21]

It's your game, but personally, I would go easy on the huscarls. They really are overpowered for the early era. It might make your game dull. Sort of like RTW post-Marian legionnaires fighting warbands... I'd take one or two per 16 units to represent your elite warriors. Normal vikings are very decent fighters in the early period anyway.

[Martok]

It's your game, but personally, I would go easy on the huscarls. They really are overpowered for the early era. It might make your game dull. Sort of like RTW post-Marian legionnaires fighting warbands... I'd take one or two per 16 units to represent your elite warriors.

Yeah, I should've mentioned that in my earlier post as well. Even when I have a large Danish empire, I doubt I've ever had more than 10 Huscarle regiments in the field at any given time--and even that's a lot.

Normal vikings are very decent fighters in the early period anyway.

Also quite true. Between Landsmen, Carls, and "vanilla" Vikings, the Danes already have far and away the best infantry line-up in the Early period. Adding Huscarles to the Danes' roster is like buying a jet-powered car when you already own a Porsche, Lambourgini, and a Corvette--it's overkill.

@Geezer57: Thanks for helping on the build requirements. I couldn't remember whether or not a spearmakers workshop was needed.

[Geezer57]

While I'm asking newbish questions, could someone tell me what infrastructure to build to get huscarls. I read here that the Danes get them in early and want to pump out as many as possible before late.

You'll need a Swordsmith + Armorer in the provinces of Denmark, Norway, or Sweden.

[sbroadbent]

econ21 is correct. Choosing between Normal and Hard isn't really going to affect how agressive the AI is on the campaign map. It would be different if you were playing on Easy (the AI is generally more passive), but obviously you needn't worry about that in your case.

One thing I have noticed though is that on the Easy difficulty level, there is usually one (sometimes two) factions who are over aggressive, and will take a lot of territory very quickly. It then becomes a match between you and that faction, as very few other factions will even be able to stand against them. I've played in games where factions will get eliminated, usually by the actions of just one faction. Unless you do something early, that aggressive faction will mass alot of troops and alot of ships. You'll likewise need similar resources, or find ways of bringing the faction down. Inquisitors work great against catholic factions.

On the other hand, on the higher difficulties, because more factions tend to be more aggressive, the game is better at keeping things balanced. Fewer factions get eliminated early, and there is more potential for the steamrolling factions to come to a halt, or atleast slow their rate of expansion enough for you to catch up yourself. The only problem with the highest difficulties is that you start out with even less money, and the AI gains boosts in the strategic battles.