Exonctually.This is in the UK, so it might be different elsewhere, but I've always found aetheists here to be far more intolerant than Christians.
Exonctually.This is in the UK, so it might be different elsewhere, but I've always found aetheists here to be far more intolerant than Christians.
When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman? From the beginning all men by nature were created alike, and our bondage or servitude came in by the unjust oppression of naughty men. For if God would have had any bondsmen from the beginning, he would have appointed who should be bound, and who free. And therefore I exhort you to consider that now the time is come, appointed to us by God, in which ye may (if ye will) cast off the yoke of bondage, and recover liberty. - John Ball
Ah, but Christianity started in what Christians call the "East". Do not try to judge the Western Christians by the Eastern Christians and vice versa unless you just say believe Jesus is the saviour of man kind and the fundamentals of Christianity.Originally Posted by Aenlic
"Half of your brain is that of a ten year old and the other half is that of a ten year old that chainsmokes and drinks his liver dead!" --Hagop Beegan
Tequinically (i can never get that word right) it was roman at the time but now is the east. Anywho, eastern christianity has alot of differences with the western one. Pretty much like trying to judge Roman Catholics by the Orthodox Christian.Originally Posted by IrishArmenian
And vice versa
put simply... nonsense... plain and simple...Wht is religion to you?
I don't have a problem with people who believe traditional forms of nonsense in the privacy of their own homes, but the ones who promote such nonsense and encourage irrational or even plain stupid behaviours are a disgrace to humanity.
here are a bunch of quite thoughtful and sometimes fun quotes both condemning and supporting religion/s and/or god/s:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religion
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Faith
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/God
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Atheism
I cannot speak for Islam, but I can assure you that there is no record of Jesus Christ commanding his disciples to forcefully "convert" anyone. Evangalism is clearly commanded, but nothing that would be considered violating one's "rights". Whenever Christians have done so, they have done so in contradiction. And claiming Christianity is worthless because of the number of poor examples is like claiming socialism (or any other form of government) is worthless because its advocates have failed to live up to its ideal.Originally Posted by Aenlic
I can agree with what you're saying. But its certainly not fair to say that everyone who follows or believes in a certain religion does so because the same religion says to. Scriptures' claim to be divinely inspired isn't my reason for believing it. I believe it based on the evidence of its validity, particularly that which I have experienced myself.Originally Posted by Aenlic
I'm glad you're interested in the betterment of mankind, which is what I assume you mean by "progress as a species". As a Christian, I also believe that improving the health, happiness, and wellbeing of our race should be of great importance to all persons. But, as a Christian, I believe that there is another dimension, so to speak: eternity. And I don't think our condition as eternal beings directly correlates to our situation as a species. So both sides must be addressed, and in different manners. You may not find this belief useful, but the ethical and moral implications of Christianity do not interfere with the betterment of the human race. Only when one chooses to deny science's practicality in response to their inability to reconcile scientific theory (or their understanding of it) with the Biblical story (or their understanding of it) is the progress of the species endangered. And I don't see any good reason for a Christian to do so.Originally Posted by Aenlic
All the stupid things CHristians have done have been against Jesus' teachings so why blame Christianity because of people who don't FOLLOW its teachings??
Its like me saying I'm a pacifist and yet I go out killing people, do you blame pacifists for killing people??
The Crusades were against Christ's teachings
The Spanish Inquisiation were against Christ's teachings
and yet Christianity is to be blamed for something it does NOT advocate.
You don't find me saying Buddha is evil just because his followers participated in the persecution of Christians during the Tang Dynasty do you? You don't find me saying Buddha is evil just because the Lamais of Tibet persecuted Christians during the 19th century do you? Buddha's a nice chap, would have been a low maintenance buddy cos he fasted a lot, but I can't blame him for his misguided follower's doing can I? Of course not.
So why should anyone be disgusted if Muslims, Christians think they're right and ur wrong. Athiests think they're right and religious ppl as wrong so why should they escape being called "intolerant"........
Come on, lets be sensible here. Each and everyone of us will always think some ppl are wrong and we're right....
We have better things to argue about.....like how my country's bananas are better than yours...
Retired from games altogether!!
Feudalism TOtal War, non-active member and supporter. Long Live Orthodox Christianity!
"Pure religion ... is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction and to keep himself unspotted from the world".
Status Emeritus
![]()
Makes you wonder about the figurines, right?Originally Posted by kataphraktoi
![]()
Status Emeritus
![]()
Oh you cheeky fella.Makes you wonder about the figurines, right?![]()
Retired from games altogether!!
Feudalism TOtal War, non-active member and supporter. Long Live Orthodox Christianity!
I have mixed feelings about the church.
I agree that the system of one God tends to make people of other religions turn away from Christianity. While most of the Christians are tolerant towards others, I noticed that some Christians tend to be conservative, and were suspicious of people who acted "liberal".
On the other hand, I have seen how the church can help during times of trouble. When Christians know one another, they help each other get through difficult times. I have two uncles who lost their jobs during the last recession. My grandfather sent them money once in a while. One of my uncle was over 50 and couldn't find a decent job. He worked in one of those jobs where he had to be away from his home for days and travel great distances. When I saw him three years ago, he looked very tired but was full of anger. I met him again last month, and he looked full of hope. If it wasn't for the church keeping his hopes high, then I don't know what he would be doing now. He is studying to be a priest. My other uncle became an alcoholic after he lost his job. The church helped him get through hard times. Later on, he met a friend who was his roommate in college. His friend invited my uncle to work with him in his business.
By the way, the bad times tend to return after the good times. I have already seen three different recessions so far.
Last edited by Cha; 08-20-2006 at 16:35.
Kataphraktoi, you are confusing 'Religion' with 'Christ's teachings'. One can follow Christ's precepts (whether you believe he existed or not) and the best of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, the ancient and modern philosophers, etc, etc, without having to construct an authoritarian, prescriptive, narrow-minded, institutional structure in order to manipulate and pervert those teachings.
Dum spiro spero
A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging their prejudices.
- William James
No I am not, I know the difference between religion and Christ's teachings and by no means claim his precepts exclusively as Judaeo-Christian. I am simply identifying false grounds for accusation when the two are mixed together. I believe I have in fact segregated and not mixed religion and Christ's teachings together.Kataphraktoi, you are confusing 'Religion' with 'Christ's teachings'. One can follow Christ's precepts (whether you believe he existed or not) and the best of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, the ancient and modern philosophers, etc, etc, without having to construct an authoritarian, prescriptive, narrow-minded, institutional structure in order to manipulate and pervert those teachings.
And are you assuming religion is "authoritarian, prescriptive, narrow-minded, institutional structure"???
Why is it only religion?
A religion is an opinion, much like political ideology is an opinion, much like atheism, evolution is an opinion.
Its not religion vs secularism. Its religion as one of many issues of human opinions which we frequently disagree over.
Retired from games altogether!!
Feudalism TOtal War, non-active member and supporter. Long Live Orthodox Christianity!
We shall have to agree to differ then.![]()
There's no use arguing about matters of opinion or belief.
Dum spiro spero
A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging their prejudices.
- William James
What is religeon to me ? It is about being nice .
As for Christians and Muslims being equally intolerant: I don't see many Christians strapping explosives to themselves and then walking onto crowded city buses.
Perhaps you don't see it because you don't look Divinus .
See an example of being nice by suggesting that someone actually looks before making a silly accusation .![]()
Consumer-driven & Western world.Originally Posted by Al Khalifah
Choice of goods.
Choice of services.
Education.
Free to choose my belief system.
Nearer equality of man and woman.
Freedom to choose the number of children I have.
Longer life span if I choose to look after myself.
So access to health services and accurate information.
Free to choose who I marry or who I live with.
etc
Originally Posted by Orb
Not one occasion? have you actually met a Christian? I mean by default you must have meet at least one with a hateful or backwards opnion based upon their Christian outlook?
I cannot recall an atheist ever coming to my door or harrassing me on the the street. Nor can I remember receiving arrogent midly bigoted pamflets to my door. A few pretentious comments, half baked insults and completly valid criticisms vs 2000 of aggressive proliferation at any cost is like comparing the drizzle to the Tsunami.
Some opnions have more merit than others would'nt you agree?A religion is an opinion, much like political ideology is an opinion, much like atheism, evolution is an opinion.
It's waiting in the shadows, you can see it's reflection in shot-up abortion clinics and death threats to Non-Christians. Don't delude yourself into thinking that a few pleasent decades mean that Christianity is free of its hubris. A bad few years, an unfortunate turn of events and they'll be strapping bombs to their chest in the name of his perfect love.As for Christians and Muslims being equally intolerant: I don't see many Christians strapping explosives to themselves and then walking onto crowded city buses.
As to what I think of religion and the individual. I consider it a block of marble half carved already: their is already shape, theme and structure to it but it what occurs next is up to you.
Last edited by Mithras; 08-21-2006 at 01:16.
Roma locuta est. Causa finita est
In response to the quotes in the first few posts, where the quoted individual says:
Christians are brainwashed...bad, etc.
I disagree. 99% of the Christians and about 80% of the agonistics I know, regardless of which Church they go to, if they worship often, or exactly how they go about it, are welcoming, good spirited individuals, who serve their community willingly and as often as possible.
On the other hand, almost all my conversations with atheists go something like this:
A: What do you believe in?
Me: I'm Catholic.
A: *launches long tirade about why they are right and I am wrong*
This happens almost every single time I talk to an atheist in real life.
Conclusion: From my experience (I'm sure it's not like this everywhere), it is not Christians, Muslims, or Jews who are brainwashed or just bad people, but it is the atheists who rub their doctrine into our faces, and are generally inconsiderade jerks. I have never met a Christian who has tried to sway me to his faith with such blunt and disgusting methods (the fact it is also my faith does not apply, as generally the people do not know).
Disclaimer: This applies to my experiences in real life, not the .Org, TWC, SCC, or any other places I may or may not be involved. I am responding to the unknown quoted individual. I am not bashing atheists, but I am absoloutly sick of the way they attempt to bludgeon my faith.
Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 08-21-2006 at 02:13.
I love how the atheist makes it seem as thought the world would be perfect if there was no religion. An atheist can never truely understand what religion and spirtuality mean to the believer, and therefore have no right to make statements blaming the worlds problems on Christians.
Atheists have the capacity to kill too, you know. Religion unites, Atheism seperates.
Last edited by John86; 08-21-2006 at 05:24.
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan
"It's somewhat ironic that closing spam threads increases my postcount"
-Ser Clegane
Remember, it works the other way, too. Almost all Christians (minus a couple of friends with whom the conversation goes differently, I'll explain later) have a similar conversation, it goes:Originally Posted by evil_maniac from mars
A: Do you believe in God?
Me: No, I'm atheist.
A: Oh ... I'm a member of the Church of ...
You can guess where it goes, at which point I start a tirade about how I'm not interested in religion (using all the proper reasons), questioning their faith, etc.
Now, with my friends it's different, it goes like this:
A: You're an atheist?
Me: Uh-huh. So?
A: But how can you believe there is no higher power?
Me: Correction, I don't believe, I claim ... and I can, done that for the past 19 years, doing it still.
This is usualy where the converastion changes direction, and thus ends the religious part.
So, you see ... the whole religion sucks is a defense mechanism you develop fairly early on, since the religious bunch bug you incessantly, you learn how to drive them off quickly.
However, most of the criticism used is grounded in reality, maybe a bit exaggerated, but true nevertheless.
All the benefits the "Western" nations have is because of Christianity. Democracy came about because of Christianity, we have the freedom of speech, we can choose who we can marry, we are allowed to wear what we like.
Without an absoloute(God), nothing else makes sense. If you take away God, why is it wrong to kill or steal? Chaos would follow, because there would be me no morals or rules.
Ekklesia Mafia: - An exciting new mafia game set in ancient Athens - Sign up NOW!
***
"Oh, how I wish we could have just one Diet session where the Austrians didn't spend the entire time complaining about something." Fredericus von Hamburg
Originally Posted by Hiji
heh heh you're funny. Name one religion which doesnt have a legion of sects and name a single war which was fought in Atheisms name.
Originally Posted by Ignoramus
False, even if what you said was true (it isnt) it would not make Christianity correct. Hypotheticly even if Christianity did encourage morality that doesnt make it the correct veiwpoint.
Modern Democracy is a product of the early modern world. The enlightenment where (Pagan) antiquity political/Social/Philisophical thought combined with the economic and social changes triggured by the black plague. Christianity was not univolved however it was often found in opposition to these changes rather than in favour of them (kings divine rights and all that Jazz) fused to emphasise that various factors which encourage democracy.
I would also argue that you're a pretty immoral guy if you're going to rampage around raping, murdering and stealing if god doeant exist.
Last edited by Mithras; 08-21-2006 at 10:57.
Roma locuta est. Causa finita est
At this point I would refer you to the work of Max Weber, specifically, his work on protestant ethics and the spirit of captialsim. It was their obsession with worldly wealth (and the accumulation of it) that spurred capitalism, so, yes, I grant you that Christianity created capitalism (and sice I hate capitalism ...).Originally Posted by Ignoramus
Now, Chrstianity and democracy? Interesting, all the absolutis rulers were Christian ... it was the duty of a Christian to obey their betters ... so, where does democracy or freedom of speech fit in? I seem to remember that merely saying some things in Christian communities not that far in history would get you punished (as those are the word of Satan) ... not exactly freedom of speech in my mind.
The choosing of who we can marry is a different matter. It evolved in the 18th century, and Christianity had little to do with it. Rather, it is connected to the idea of Romantic marriage ... earlier on, love was the theme for tragic stories, and marriage was simply a tool to improve one's social position. BTW, we are feeling the sideffects of that in the vastly inceased number of divorces ... emotion can be fickle.
Allowed to wear what we like. Hm, I don't think so. If anything Christians were overly insistent on chastity and honor to allow that. We still do have that, albeit less and only in certain situation (school dress codes, etc). Suppose I like prancing around naked, if I could wear what I like, and that amounts to a hat, then I wouldn't be arrested, or would I?
Without an absolute, nothing makes sense when you don't understand the fundamental principles that this universe is founded on. The need for relgious enforcement of social norms is no longer present, law has taken that place. And if you think rules still come from a Church or from God (whose first rules on the list are that you must worship him), then you are sadly mistaken.
Now, about chaos. We've already ascertained that Christianity was a factor in the creation of capitalism. Capitalism makes cheating a good, even required thing, if one wants to succeed. Free market can be said to be chaotic ... therefore, I would let you find the conclusion of where the chaos stems from.
I am not one that thinks religion didn't advance humanity ... but please don't inflate things. Although I am curious to see the reasoning behind the above-quoted statement.
EDIT: Guess I was beaten to it by Mithras.
Last edited by Keba; 08-21-2006 at 11:01.
I don’t know from where to start. Maybe from Cha’s posts from that other forum.
Islam is not only in “no good” relation with Christianity, Islam is in no good relations with other religions like Judaism (Israel and surrounding Moslem Arabs) and Hinduism (see Pakistan and India in Kashmir).Not to mention the "holier-than-thou" attitude. Honestly, I see no difference between Christianity and Islam. This "intolerant", "war-like", "my way is the only way" mindset is very dangerous. That's why after all these centuries, these two religions are still up to "no good".
This statement is only belief and nothing more. Buddhism started as philosophy and later turned into religion.to me, Christianity is basically rewrapped Buddhist type spirituality passed thru Sumer into the Old Testament, and then it gets unknowingly exported back into the areas where Sumerians brought their spiritual beliefs from...
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
Ceasar010 answered on that excellent:Originally Posted by SSNeoperestroika
I will add that communists tried to do that and they failed. Religion will never extinct.Originally Posted by Ceasar010
Typical attitude in Protestantism formally established from Martin Luther in XVI century.Originally Posted by Ceasar010
I agree. But those “Christians” you mentioned are not.Originally Posted by Ceasar010
Last edited by DukeofSerbia; 08-21-2006 at 12:05.
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
Pure atheists don’t exist. Atheism means that you don’t have any idea (or to say conception) about God (Divine). Those so called atheists are antitheists. They have idea about God but it’s negative (they don’t believe in God in simple words).Originally Posted by IrishArmenian
I agree with you. And as I know Armenians and Armenian Apostolic Church are Oriental Orthodox.Originally Posted by IrishArmenian
But, it is not so bad in USA like your nephew said. There are a lot of traditional Protestants in USA, and USA is more conservative than most countries in European Union.
Originally Posted by IrishArmenian
I agree with both of you (it seems that we are (all three) Orthodox).Originally Posted by Hannibal99
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
@whyidie
Excellent post.
That’s why Jesus Christ said to Disciples: “When I come to the Earth again will I found faith?” I don’t know in which Gospel is that (from my head) and I translated that from Serbian.Originally Posted by whyidie
I absolutely agree.Originally Posted by whyidie
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
And than we will finally create “Paradise in the Earth”...Originally Posted by Aenlic
Religion will never extinct.
The most people in world history WERE KILLED by ATHEIST’S Communist’s regimes in Soviet Union, China and else where they ruled in XX century.
Are you satisfied now?
I don’t know for UK, but I know for former Communist’s block in Eastern Europe. Do I have to mention how religion was prohibited (not officially except in Albania)? Discrimination and murdering/killing of Christians (plus Moslems and Buddhists in Soviet Union) was very high. When I was born dictator Joseph Broz Tito was dead, but Communists still ruled in Yugoslavia. I was baptized secretly...Originally Posted by Orb
Last edited by DukeofSerbia; 08-21-2006 at 12:07.
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
Questions for those who oppose religion:
1. If religion is result of ignorance, why then progress in scientific knowledge doesn’t push religion as ignorance? If religious evidences are not scientifically true, why the most people still believe in them?
2. If religious evidences are not scientifically true, are they then nonsensical?
3. If religion is really illusion, is it possible reality without any illusions?
4. If faith is in opposition to reason, why the most famous heads from science didn’t found contrasts between reason and faith?
Watching
EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00
Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.
Most were not killed in the name of Aethism though. Most Chinese were killed in The Great Leap Forward - a flawed political descision that affected everyone. In the USSR people were killed for many reasons, but it was unusual for their religion to be the cause of their deaths, more commonly political or ethnic grounds.Originally Posted by DukeofSerbia
And let's not forget earlier genocides such as Ghangis Khan or Catholics in South America. Both had religion, and slaughtered many people.
![]()
Last edited by rory_20_uk; 08-21-2006 at 12:13.
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
a religion is only as good as the believer (ie. a religion - or religous text - cannot be held responsible for the actions of its followers, because everyone interprets the religion differently....
Bookmarks