[long vid] Loose Change

**LeftEyeNine** · 08-18-2006, 19:01

Oh well, yes this is another conspiracy theory based on 9/11. The movie is a professional production that is around 1.5 hours. On such a connection I am not able to watch it. But I'd like your opinions whether it is a bullocks of 90 minutes or not -if you spare time to watch it.

Loose Change

It may utterly be a hoax, but please don't rush over "oh is this it again" if you didn't watch it.

**Devastatin Dave** · 08-18-2006, 20:00

I'll watch it tonight.

**scotchedpommes** · 08-19-2006, 00:01

Watched this on youtube [it's in 2 smaller parts there] shortly after seeing
Don's topic on the subject. Out of all the questions raised, I would be more
interested to see any clear confirmation that the hijackers mentioned are still
living. Would also be interested to see views on the issue of the temperatures
required to cause the buildings to collapse.

[I still view this as being implausible, although it does raise questions, naturally
any conspiracy theory is bound to do so.]

Are there any comprehensive counter arguments available?

**Beirut** · 08-19-2006, 00:06

I've watched it a few times. It raises lots of questions.

I'm not saying I believe it all, but I would love to hear/see the counter argument.

**Louis VI the Fat** · 08-19-2006, 01:49

Originally Posted by Beirut

I would love to hear/see the counter argument.

'9-11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide
And debunking of various 9/11 conspiracy theories' here

**LeftEyeNine** · 08-27-2006, 00:58

Well I just finished watching it. And well this thing indeed fills your head with questions.

**Al Khalifah** · 08-27-2006, 01:04

It scares the crap out of me and I sincerly hope it's all a load of nonsense (99% likely) because if it isn't then we're all in danger.

**scotchedpommes** · 08-27-2006, 01:10

Originally Posted by Al Khalifah

It scares the crap out of me and I sincerly hope it's all a load of nonsense (99% likely) because if it isn't then we're all in danger.

I would suggest that's stretching things, to say that, but I must say I don't think
much of the "preview" of the counter argument provided on that page linked to
above.

**Husar** · 08-27-2006, 02:45

Originally Posted by Al Khalifah

It scares the crap out of me and I sincerly hope it's all a load of nonsense (99% likely) because if it isn't then we're all in danger.

You know, I refuse to watch it.
I'm rather happy now and don't need such a movie to make me sad before going to sleep(neither in the morning, making me think all day long...).
Whatever it says, it's either true or not, but I don't feel like I can change it.
I would guess it's about the US and I don't live there so why should I bother?
I don't want to sound like an ass, but maybe sometimes ignorance is a bliss.

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 08-27-2006, 03:54

Originally Posted by SSNeoperestroika

Would also be interested to see views on the issue of the temperatures
required to cause the buildings to collapse.

Steel melts at 1525° C, jet fuel burns at only 825° C, but steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C.

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

**LeftEyeNine** · 08-27-2006, 04:18

That was hilarious.

**Alexanderofmacedon** · 08-27-2006, 19:55

Saw that video a long time ago. It is VERY good and raises a lot of questions. I think it's good for EVERYONE to watch this.

**Al Khalifah** · 08-28-2006, 00:44

It raises a lot of questions, but the journalistic style is very poor. It takes a lot of out of context quotes and tries to fabricate them into an argument. I could produce an argument suggesting just about anyone was involved in just about anything provided they'd said enough things that had been published.

A lot of it is quote mining and coincidence. If I want to turn the whole thing around its worth pointing out it was produced by a wanabee film student rejected from every major American film school. Go figure.