Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

  1. #1

    Default Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Hi guys,

    This is my first post, but I've been lurking for a month now. I would like to thank the EB team for making the best mod for RTW around.

    Currently I am interested in the Haydasian faction. I gave them a go and found their position at first difficult. As I progressed through the campaign I found that I didn't have many reliable units to draw an army from. Anyone know if the Armenians are getting more units in .8? Didn't they have imitation legionaires at one point, or was that just Vanilla RTW inaccuracy?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Member Member Bonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ice planet Hoth!
    Posts
    1,987

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Armeniy will get much more and better Units in the upcoming 0.8 release, but afaik no imitation legionaries.


  3. #3

    Default thanks

    Ah, ok. Thanks for replying. Any idea what type of new units they'll get? I guess the imitation legions were just fluff, or did they exist out of EB's time frame?

  4. #4
    Now sporting a classic avatar! Member fallen851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    799

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Well Pontus copied Rome's Legionaries after being defeated by them, but I don't know about Armenia...
    "It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s

  5. #5
    Member Member Bonny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ice planet Hoth!
    Posts
    1,987

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Hayasdan is getting more and heavy inf (including a heavy Phalanx unit) and regional troops.
    The whole eastern recruitment area is going to be improved (100 new units, most of them in the east afaik).

    There won't be unit called Imitation Legionari, that just looks like the roman legionari just in other colors.
    Instead of that there are unit's like the Greek Thorakitai (sp?) or the Karthadast Heavy Infantrie (forgot the name) that represent an develeopement of other factions towards the roman warfare. Maybe some EB mebers can clarify this better than i.


  6. #6
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by fallen851
    Well Pontus copied Rome's Legionaries after being defeated by them, but I don't know about Armenia...
    With regards to Pontus, I think Sertorius supposedly also sent people to train Mithridates' troops as part of some kind of deal, though whether they were trained in Roman fashion I wouldn't know.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  7. #7
    Now sporting a classic avatar! Member fallen851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    799

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Well they weren't exact copies, but Pontus traditional phalanx forces were gone, replaced by shields and swords very similar to Roman troops.

    I believe he made a point of copying their tactics, more so that their equiptment, but I would have to check.
    "It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s

  8. #8

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonny
    the Karthadast Heavy Infantrie (forgot the name) that represent an develeopement of other factions towards the roman warfare. Maybe some EB mebers can clarify this better than i.
    I believe this is the Elite African Infantry, both sword and spear/pike/sarissa/pointy stick of doom. I don't know about the other factions.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    I believe that at some point in the second century BC the armenians used roman style weopens and armour and tactics
    Imperator de Basileia Ton Romaion-A "The long road" M2tw AAR
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...41#post1657841
    Click here if you want to know what a freshly shaven **** looks like.

  10. #10
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Wouldn't it have to be in the FIrst Century BC? The Marian Reforms were 107 BC, and Armenia wasn't really fought IIRC until after that.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  11. #11
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkarbiter
    I believe that at some point in the second century BC the armenians used roman style weopens and armour and tactics
    Love to see some evidence for that assertation. Considering that Armenian did not have an alphabet till the 3rd century AD written evidence is non-existant and most work comes from foreign powers writing about Hayasdan.

    Hayasdan's unit list for 0.8 will be either complete or almost complete. The basic list is something akin to this.

    Caucasian Spearmen - Cheap regional spear unit
    Armenian Slingers - simple slinger unit
    Eastern Javelinmen - simple javelin unit
    Armenian Archers - Eastern archer unit
    Armenian Spearmen - Factional spear unit
    Javelin Horsemen - Light skirmisher horse unit
    Armenian Horse-archers - Light HA unit with spear.
    Aspet Hetselazor - Medium/Heavy cavalry unit
    Warrior Swordsmen - Theuros Shield, sword and javelin
    Cataphract Horse-archers - Medium/Heavy HA unit with spear
    Noble Cavalry - Heavy Cataphract cavalry unit
    Noble Guard - Heavy spear unit

    There will also be a Georgian unit for those who manage to take Kartli and Egrisi, but we won't say anymore about that.

    Pretty much all except one of those above units are a given for 0.8, but I'll my hardest to make sure all of them are in for 0.8.

    Foot
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


  12. #12
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,065
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by fallen851
    Well they weren't exact copies, but Pontus traditional phalanx forces were gone, replaced by shields and swords very similar to Roman troops.

    I believe he made a point of copying their tactics, more so that their equiptment, but I would have to check.
    Just out of curiosity: what are your sources for this? The books I read were always very vague on the subject, saying that Mithradates obtained Roman instructors to copy Roman drill, but nothing about equipment or tactics. But I haven't read much on the subject, so I wouldn't really know.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  13. #13
    Elephant Master Member Conqueror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In the Ruins of Europe
    Posts
    1,258

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    @ Foot:

    Thanks for that list! It seems like Hayasdan will have a diverse unit roster with potential for many different tactics. I'm sure it'll be an enjoyable faction to play.

    RTW, 167 BC: Rome expels Greek philosophers after the Lex Fannia law is passed. This bans the effete and nasty Greek practice of 'philosophy' in favour of more manly, properly Roman pursuits that don't involve quite so much thinking.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Foot is the freaking man. He has worked very hard on getting this faction (and has done more than his share for the whole mod too) ready for 0.8 and it will be much more enjoyable because of it. If we had people as motivated as he was for each faction, I think we'd be done by now with all the cultural and text stuff.

  15. #15

    Default Thank you for answering my question and then some

    Thank you for answering my question and then some. I was searching for screenshots of some of the new Armenian units and found a couple in the Eastern Factions preview. Is there any chance we can see more?

    Awesome work on the new skins that I have seen!

  16. #16
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


  17. #17
    Prodder of Stuff Member Musopticon?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Finland, Kouvola
    Posts
    201

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Well well, it seems someone finally did Hayasdan justice.

    Guess who I'll be playing first in 0.8? Just amazing.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Question regarding the Haydasian faction.

    Thanks, Foot.

    I already had a chance to see the first two links, but I haven't seen the third one. I'm guessing that will be the Armenian assault infantry? It looks really good. Can't wait to use them

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO