Ah, the good old ad hominem. I was wondering how soon you'd resort to it. Perhaps you should try and get a refund from any debate classes you might have attended.

Well rabbit perhaps you had better read what you wrote if you cannot remember it is in the first post of the topic written by Crazed Rabbit if you need more help you could look at it when it is bolded again .

So why haven't you heard about it?
Errr .......we have . Oh but thats just rhetorical isn't it you are only asking people why they havn't heard of something when they have heard of something .....errrrr ....... thats not rhetorical rabbit thats bollox .
But then you give a bollox reason why people havn't heard what they have heard.....Becuase it is democrats and ex-clinton officials, and Clinton himself, doing all the pressuring and intimidation. It is not Bush, his administration, or Republicans, but democrats seeking to pressure an independent media company into altering their show......ahhhhh of course the good old liberal media bias that doesn't report things ...but it is reported isn't it So you manage not only a strawman and an ad hominen in your opening post you don't even realise .
Perhaps you should try to stop making strawmen and then building your argument off that. Of course, then you might have to take advantage of what, I'm sure, is your amazing education and think a bit.
 perhaps you should heed your own words .