Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Sheesh, auto-calc is merciless! I have to fight the most uninteresting and unconsequential battles that I know I'll win, though the auto-calc will give me defeat, or a victory with massive casualties on my side and few on the enemy's.

    I wonder, when 0.8 comes out and I start a new campaign, can I choose Campaign difficulty Medium instead of Very Hard? Or are the side-effects too great and VH is indeed the only way to play the game, even if it forces you to fight battles you don't want to fight?


  2. #2
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Very Hard makes the AI more Agressive If I remember. It also gives it a free 10 000 mnai per turn.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  3. #3
    Gin Tonic Drinker Member iberus_generalis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Scallabis (mordern Santarém)- Lusitania(modern Portugal)
    Posts
    303

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    VH is much more intersting in the long run, at the begining is hard as hell, but once you stabilize, theres no problem...if you play in Easy,after ten minutes of fighting the game becomes dull..i recomend VH/VH=)
    "Deep in Iberia there is a tribe that doesn't rule itself, nor allows anyone to rule it"Gaius Julius Caesar

  4. #4
    aka Artaserse (the Lone Borg) Member Obelics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Naples ITA
    Posts
    665

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Im also a VH/VH sort of fan, but i have to admit that with some civilization it is really difficult, while KH have problem only with the successors (Kleurichoi Agema, and Pezetharoi), Parthian horse archers are useless if they dont have at last 4 or 5 chevrons... but im agree that when you are stabilized, it is really fun, actually im having a really bad time, but still fun with sweboz (with KH), while my Pahlava campaign is going to be a sort of gueriilla cause i cant afford to fight enemys huge army...

    Anyway remember that VH add +7attack/+7defence to the enemy, so a enemy unit that have 14 attack 14 armour, 4 shield and 10 def (for example) could be a sort of "borg" unit (invincible) on the battlefield, im referring to the nasty ptolemaics Kleurichoi Agema (i dream that damned unit even in the night...)

    pheraphs H is a better compromise, but my stupid pride dont allow me to turn back on H...

  5. #5
    Wandering Historian Member eadingas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Llanfairpwll- gwyngyll- gogerych- wyrndrobwll- llantysilio- gogogoch
    Posts
    4,714

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    I think with 0.8, H will be quite enough. In my testing, with factions such as Hayasdan or Pontus it's quite hard to not lose a game on Hard, especially the first years when you have no army, no cash and everyone's attacking you :)
    Also, we strongly recommend Medium diff in battles. The stats are carefully calculated, and adding extra bonuses for AI might just mess up things.
    Last edited by eadingas; 09-13-2006 at 12:26.
    I'm still not here

  6. #6
    Member Member Christianus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nidarosiensis, Norway
    Posts
    150

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Does playing on "Hard" difficulty give the Ai extra money on each turn?
    As on Very Hard, the AI gains 10.000 extra in cash between each turn.
    Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
    κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
    - Σιμωνίδης ὁ Κεῖος

  7. #7

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Quote Originally Posted by eadingas
    I think with 0.8, H will be quite enough. In my testing, with factions such as Hayasdan or Pontus it's quite hard to not lose a game on Hard, especially the first years when you have no army, no cash and everyone's attacking you :)
    Also, we strongly recommend Medium diff in battles. The stats are carefully calculated, and adding extra bonuses for AI might just mess up things.
    I would LOVE to play VH/M. But since the AI doesn't know how to fight, especially with a phalanx. I play VH/VH so the AI has a shot at winning a battle.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    Quote Originally Posted by eadingas
    I think with 0.8, H will be quite enough. In my testing, with factions such as Hayasdan or Pontus it's quite hard to not lose a game on Hard, especially the first years when you have no army, no cash and everyone's attacking you :)
    Also, we strongly recommend Medium diff in battles. The stats are carefully calculated, and adding extra bonuses for AI might just mess up things.
    so the recommended difficulties levels might change for 0.8?

  9. #9
    Wise and Partially Handsome Member Jarardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Midlands, US
    Posts
    155

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    He's talking about the autocalc. I've definetly noticed the same thing, though I belive EB gives enemy generals command star bonuses? I think this is what makes the autocalc so merciless, and I agree, especialy when my empire gets large, the game gets to tedious to enjoy anymore. The command star bonuses are great for other reasons, but for fights where my army is truly superior, and if I play out the battle I'll anihalate the enemy, most of the time I'd much rather autocalc the battle.
    I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein


    www.EuropaBarbarorum.com

  10. #10

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    i play on medium because of the rebel problem. when they spawn they just stand there and do nothing instead of attacking your towns, whereas on hard/vh they will, if i remember correctly.

    once 0.8 comes along i'll turn the random rebel spawn off and play on a higher difficulty.

  11. #11
    Krusader's Nemesis Member abou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,513

    Default Re: Do we really have to play the campaign on VH?

    It would have been nice for EB to bring back the auto_win cheat for those instances where the enemy army is miniscule or where you have a CTD after an heroic victory. I understand the issue of cheating, but still.

    Unless there was a scripting issue with it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO