Is it the same about re-emergencies?
Re: Civil Wars? ...
Is it the same about re-emergencies?
This post was not written by a native English speaker, we apologise for the fault in the grammar and spelling.
Re: Civil Wars? ...
Personally I found the civil wars alsightly wearing. They were so devastating to an empire that I employed draconian tactics to keep them in line - either buried in a loyal stack, with the heir or utterly alone to lower the effect they could have. Really rebellious ones had a tendancy to die in battles. So as suhc I don't think that is was that great a feature.
Do the rebels "think" as a faction, or is it a convenient shell to dump them all? Having them acting at least partly in concert would IMO be a nice change.
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks