Regarding my warning points for mentioning that an extremist group that is in the news concerning an alledged terrorist plot has a website and it is easily found .
Apart from the fact that I have previously posted a direct link to this particuar groups umbrella organisation (after checking with moderators) .
Is this a new forum rule regarding certain ideologies that I am unfamiliar with ?
If so would that mean that for example .... a topic covering the upcoming elections in Germany would not be able to discuss the group (that I shall not name in case it is against forum rules) that is expected to gain a seat in Mecklenburd-Vorpommern , mention their idoelogy or their election manifesto ?
Would such a block extend to other groups in those elections like the DVU which isn't quite so neo-nazi , or those on other countries elections like Britains BNP ?
Would it also extend to other nasty groups that are mentioned in the backroom , there have been fairly recently direct links to a KKK website , Phelps god hates fags site , the PKK , several US "militia" and hispanic groups , even a current one that contains a site that links to an Assyrian "nationalist" terrorist site.......the list would just go on and on .
Not to mention both direct links and direct quotes from various nasty Islamic terror organisations , including the posting Al-qaida propoganda videos .
So is this ban on mentioning distasteful ideologies websites "period" a new rule that only applies to neo nazis involved in an alledged terrorist plot that is in the news , or does it extend to all distasteful ideologies , not only in direct links but in the mere mention of their existance ?
Or is it just a moderator acting on a whim ?
Bookmarks