View Poll Results: Which mod do you prefer? EB or RTR?

Voters
9. This poll is closed
  • EB and I think that it is the most historically accurate

    8 88.89%
  • RTR and I think that it is the most historically accurate

    0 0%
  • EB, but I think that RTR is more historically accurate

    0 0%
  • RTR, but I think that EB is more historically accurate

    1 11.11%
  • I’m not sure

    0 0%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: What do you like best? EB or RTR?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default What do you like best? EB or RTR?

    I must admit I love EB the best. Just read my (very) critical summary of RTR:

    Nobody, completly nobody who is a historian plays RTR. In someways it more hstorically inaccurate than vanillia RTW. For example RTR has all of the separate Greek Cities in the Eastern Med Unified under one banner (that includes Epirus!). Also the Germanic Tribes and the Gauls are unified too they never were historically. Also it has a very boring vannila style traits system, no goverments system, no nice new buildings for any factions, no reforms for non-Romans, Carthaginians who control land which they would not have controled and land that they would control is owned by somebody, a smaller and more boring map than EB and finally the Marius reforms happen dynamically at the same time as vannila.

    Basically RTR is vannila with a AoR, a few new units and skins, two new factions, Baktria and Illyicra (losing two factions at the SAME TIME, Dacia and Britain), a couple of faction changes and a slightly larger map. Really you might as well play vannila!
    Last edited by MSB; 09-17-2006 at 13:27.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO