Hmm, imagine that. The Pope gives a speech where he explicitly states that holy war, be it a crusade or a jihad.... religious violence of any kind is incompatible with the nature of God. As part of the speech, he offers a quote from a dialogue between a 14th century Byzantine Emperor and a Persian scholar, in which Manuel II Paleologus states that the only thing Islam has brought to the world that is unique is jihad, which is unholy.
Now I can understand hurt feelings and strongly worded disagreement. But the reaction to the Pope's speech has lost all bounds of reason. Muslims rioting against implication that they're violent...
Among other incidents include a bombing at a Greek Orthodox church (and if anybody has had it in for the Papacy through the centuries, it would be the Greek Orthodox church).
So, basically, if you want to start a riot, suggest that Muslims are violent?Doesn't that make the statement true?
I can understand the argument that Pope was painting with a broad brush, but surely the Pakistani National Assembly and the Supreme Imam of Turkey have bigger things to worry about then what the aging, ignored leader of a failing religion that is having secular legal issues in most of the countries it operates in has to say about them... If they really wanted to show Pope Benedict XVI how irrelevant he truly is, they should have ignored him, or quietly rebuffed his comments as the insane ramblings of a man out of touch. Surely the Muslim world is imbuing him with an importance that simply isn't there any more.
Bookmarks