EB -- the future?

[DeathEmperor]

I haven't tried Europa Barborum yet but from what I've seen and read there's no way such a great work of gaming art will be ignored or forgotten even when M2TW is released .

[Avicenna]

There is no way that CA will make M2TW better than EB. It's just going to be another nice-graphics-no-depth game for children. It just simply isn't in their interest to put so much time and effort into making the game very accurate and deep, which would dissuade the more childish from buying it, and therefore pushing up production cost while losing revenue.

[MSB]

There is no way that CA will make M2TW better than EB. It's just going to be another nice-graphics-no-depth game for children. It just simply isn't in their interest to put so much time and effort into making the game very accurate and deep, which would dissuade the more childish from buying it, and therefore pushing up production cost while losing revenue.

Yes, but the EB team could build on a "nice-graphics-no-depth game for children" by adding the brilliant EB depth and accuracy and using the good graphics as well. In my opinion the Total War series is there to be modded by genius' like members of the EB team so it can be made BETTER!

Although it would be good if the CA made an accurate game in the first place. Then modders would not have to waste their time improving it. Just think about it, there were hardly any mods for Shogun (accurate), a few for Medieval (reasonably accurate), but there were lots for RTW (in-accurate). It just show that people want an historically accurate game.

[Epistolary Richard]

Didn't you guys _just_ have a thread like this one?

[Avicenna]

It got too long

MJ: You must remember. The objective for CA might be a little prestige and reknown, but mostly it is MONEY MONEY MONEY $$$ !!! Hardly any of the market wants an accurate game, and I doubt they could push up the price even if it was more accurate. Most people wouldn't know/care/pay more for that.

[MSB]

It got too long

MJ: You must remember. The objective for CA might be a little prestige and reknown, but mostly it is MONEY MONEY MONEY $$$ !!! Hardly any of the market wants an accurate game, and I doubt they could push up the price even if it was more accurate. Most people wouldn't know/care/pay more for that.

I would care and I would pay (slightly) more for an accurate game and so would many others. Just think about all of the people who play historically accurate mods. Surley they must care?

[CountArach]

I would care and I would pay (slightly) more for an accurate game and so would many others. Just think about all of the people who play historically accurate mods. Surley they must care?

Yes those people would care. But all in all worldwide we make up a small percentage of the total market. We are what you would call a Niche. A very picky niche at that. Simply put marketing to us is not worth the extra money and time that would go inot producing the game. THe research alone would cost FAR too much for CA to want to make an accurate game, due to having to pay all of the historians.

Simply put... it will never happen.

[MSB]

Didn't you guys _just_ have a thread like this one?

Yes we did:
What is the future of EB?

[Trithemius]

Didn't you guys _just_ have a thread like this one?

Eternal recurrence ftw.

[Ludens]

Although it would be good if the CA made an accurate game in the first place. Then modders would not have to waste their time improving it. Just think about it, there were hardly any mods for Shogun (accurate), a few for Medieval (reasonably accurate), but there were lots for RTW (in-accurate).

Might this not have something to do with the fact that S:TW is barely moddable, M:TW reasonably moddable, and R:TW well moddable? Or with the fact that the S:TW community was small, the M:TW community intermediate and the R:TW community big?

It just show that people want an historically accurate game.

Most mods did not have realism as a requirement. Also, R:TW sold far better than S:TW and M:TW combined.

They managed well enough to make Shogun resonably historical and Medieval Totalwar was historical as well. Either they knew alot about these periods already or they did their reasearch (probably the second one). What went wrong with Rome to make it so inaccurate?

M:TW wasn't very accurate either. Take the muslim unit roster, for example. S:TW was accurate, but only because it was very simplistic. The current games are far more detailed. Also, it is relatively easy to represent the way the Japanese waged war over one century, but doing the same for several European factions over 400 years is going to take a lot more work. The problem isn't that CA is doing less research, the problem is that they've got to do more to reach the same level of accuracy for each faction.

[MSB]

M:TW wasn't very accurate either. Take the muslim unit roster, for example. S:TW was accurate, but only because it was very simplistic. The current games are far more detailed. Also, it is relatively easy to represent the way the Japanese waged war over one century, but doing the same for several European factions over 400 years is going to take a lot more work. The problem isn't that CA is doing less research, the problem is that they've got to do more to reach the same level of accuracy for each faction.

Ok correction: M:TW was resonably accurate. The Catholic factions were sort of accurate at least.

[Avicenna]

Really? From what I heard, there was a faction called 'Italy' and a faction called 'Spain'.

AFAIK, Spain had Castille, Aragon and a few Moors.
Italy wasn't united until the 19th century...

[eadingas]

No, Spain was just Castille, Aragon was a separate faction, and italians had a counter-faction of Kingdom of Sicily and Naples, so it wasn't entire Italy, but sort of "Greek Cities". Although combining Genoa with Venice into one faction was a bit irritating, and the Italians developed way too fast.

From what I recall, MTW was researched much better than RTW. At least I didn't get that sudden feeling of "wait a minute, ALL THIS IS WRONG!" back then.

[Ludens]

Ok correction: M:TW was resonably accurate. The Catholic factions were sort of accurate at least.

True. At least M:TW contained far less borderline/fantasy units than R:TW does.

I was worrying out loud that CA may develop an engine that is so new, and perhaps so much better, that folks won't want to use the RTW engine anymore. If that happens, can EB be brought up to the new engine or is all this wonderful work "trashed" (which I would not enjoy)?

Nobody really knows how difficult it is going to be to port a R:TW mod to M2:TW, but we can be certain that it will be no small task. Also, Khelvan stated that the team will first make a full version for R:TW 1.5 before considering other options. But it may be good to defer the decision to port until a bit later, when the engine has been patched and its limitations are known.

[spong]

It would be sweet if CA offered jobs to the EB team, the quality of the TW series would go through the roof if that happened, and such things have happened before in the games industry, quite alot in fact.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

There is no way that CA will make M2TW better than EB. It's just going to be another nice-graphics-no-depth game for children. It just simply isn't in their interest to put so much time and effort into making the game very accurate and deep, which would dissuade the more childish from buying it, and therefore pushing up production cost while losing revenue.

I wasn't arguing against EB's historical accuracy focus or rich unit depictions -- these are great.

I wasn't worrying about the quality of the new mercs and governance systems -- they are developing but add a wonderful tone.

I was worrying out loud that CA may develop an engine that is so new, and perhaps so much better, that folks won't want to use the RTW engine anymore. If that happens, can EB be brought up to the new engine or is all this wonderful work "trashed" (which I would not enjoy)?

If this was already addressed, my pardons. I spend too much time getting ridiculed in the Backroom to read everything here all the time (explanation, not excuse).

[Zaknafien]

I think the game engine is irrelevant as long as you have trhe means to play it. I still play alot of the 16 and even 8-bit strategy games of days of yore, simply because they are much more fun and immerisve than the quick and flashy fix todays gamers get.

[Musopticon?]

And I think that whatever you think matters very little here. The masses of fans will go for MTW2, realistic mods forum regulars are a niche. The nichest of niches actually.

[Zaknafien]

True, but who cares? As long as we're getting a game that we want to play, (however large that "we" group might be", it doesnt matter. Its not like its a popularity contest.

[Musopticon?]

I care. That's why I post.

[MarcusAureliusAntoninus]

Musopticon?, that makes a nice quote, "I care, therefor I post." ...