Results 1 to 30 of 133

Thread: Multiplayer blog is up

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    It sounds great. That's an interesting solution to the gamespeed issue that retains the fast gameplay for those that want it. If the fatigue and morale levels are well chosen, I would expect many former multiplayers to return to online play.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  2. #2
    Research Shinobi Senior Member Tamur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    #2 Bagshot Row
    Posts
    2,676

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    This is done through mechanics not combat modifiers...
    Not only a solution but a realistic one! Excellent, this is hopeful news.
    "Die Wahrheit ruht in Gott / Uns bleibt das Forschen." Johann von Müller

  3. #3
    Just an Oldfart Member Basileus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In The Kastro
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Goods news, i wont get my hopes up though need to try it first.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Anxious.. TOo damn anxious..

    Though, am worried about the unit size thing..
    "Cry, the beloved country, for the unborn child that is the inheritor of our fear. Let him not love the earth too deeply. Let him not laugh too gladly when the water runs through his fingers, nor stand too silent when the setting sun makes red the veld with fire. Let him not be moved when the birds of his land are singing, nor give too much of his heart to a mountain or a valley. For fear will rob him of all if he gives too much."

    Cry, the Beloved Country by Alan Paton.

  5. #5
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Well, they certainly have worked and thought more about MP for M2TW so that is good. The added max unit stuff is something I dont like though as its not needed for the 10K that they have balanced the game for.

    With the unit sizes I have seen in screenshots, large and huge setting is gonna be off limit for 4v4 games anyway: huge will be impossible and large only for uber high end pc's.


    CBR
    Last edited by CBR; 10-04-2006 at 18:42.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    The added amx unit stuff is good though to prevent people who like to spam certain units that are very powerful if money isn't an issue

  7. #7
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Yes but if money isnt the issue the game isnt going to be balanced anyway. Some faction will always have the most powerful unit, leaving the other factions with upgrading weaker units. Max 4 did not save MTW from being unbalanced because of that. Having no max just makes the unbalance more obvious but its still there.


    CBR

  8. #8

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    happy days

  9. #9

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by x-dANGEr
    Anxious.. TOo damn anxious..

    Though, am worried about the unit size thing..
    i agree, it said that something like the small size was a bit larger than RTW's medium, in which case it's not necessarily small and i cant imagine what these huge will be like.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    If half of this stuff is true, it will be worth coming back to multiplayer :).

    I miss they don't tell anything about max. number of players (6/8), nor if we can play against same faction (French Vs French).

    I will wait for those fatigue and morale modifiers, but overall they are very good news.


    "The game [M2TW] is actually more balanced than rock/paper/scissor. Combinations that work: rock vs rock - paper vs paper - scissor vs scissor.
    A new frontier that wipes off a bunch of old concepts"
    - Machiavelli69

    "Shogun was chess, vi was chequers rome was tiddlywinks and mtw2 musical chairs." - Swoosh So

  11. #11
    Pale, Bald, and Angry! Member Guillaume le Batard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    A state of Misery. Ahem, I mean Missouri.
    Posts
    45

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Tamur
    "This is done through mechanics not combat modifiers... "

    Not only a solution but a realistic one! Excellent, this is hopeful news.
    Can anyone help me out, and explain to me what the difference between mechanics and modifiers is, and why this is a good thing?

    Guillaume
    William the Conqueror, 1066,
    Said to his captains, 'I mean to affix
    England to Normandy. Go out and borrow
    Some bows and some arrows, we're starting tomorrow.

  12. #12
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Guillaume le Batard
    Can anyone help me out, and explain to me what the difference between mechanics and modifiers is, and why this is a good thing?

    Guillaume
    I guess he means that by modifier its done in an artificial way by giving units a a negative combat modifier. By mechanic its done by say making soldiers move out and not fight at all or something similar. The modifier is a direct (but more abstract) way of doing it and the mechanic is an indirect way trying to achieve the same result and in this case he sees the mechanic as the best way.


    CBR

  13. #13
    It was a trap, after all. Member DukeofSerbia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sombor, Serbia (one day again Kingdom)
    Posts
    1,001

    Default Timurids ans serfs

    Elephants for Timurids look good.

    Cavalry Balance: No longer is there a need to cap cavalry, they kill on the charge but when they stop they are easy targets. Like infantry they cannot be selected and moved as an indestructible mass ”blob”. If you find your cavalry surrounded by enemy units and try and get out of there - bad luck, you are just too big to be missed, even peasants will thrust at your mount. Best of all missiles love cavalry, such big juicy targets, how can you miss.
    Peasants/Serfs can't beat knights in any situation in open battle (except if is not in marche).
    Watching
    EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00

    Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.

  14. #14
    Imperialist Brit Member Orb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,751

    Default Re: Timurids ans serfs

    Atrocious punctuation from CA. "era's" indeed.

    That said, I'm optimistic about most of the things.


    'My intelligence is not just insulted, it's looking for revenge with a gun and no mercy. ' - Frogbeastegg

    SERA NIMIS VITA EST CRASTINA VIVE HODIE

    The life of tomorrow is too late - live today!

  15. #15
    Ricardus Insanusaum Member Bob the Insane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: Timurids ans serfs

    Quote Originally Posted by DukeofSerbia
    Peasants/Serfs can't beat knights in any situation in open battle (except if is not in marche).
    I am sure the the lone knight surrounded by a 100 or so angry peasants with pitch forks would not be too quick to agree with you there...

    I think it would be only right that the best unit used poorly would/should be vunerable to even the worst unit used correctly...

  16. #16

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    A standing horse is easy to kill as well...


    "The game [M2TW] is actually more balanced than rock/paper/scissor. Combinations that work: rock vs rock - paper vs paper - scissor vs scissor.
    A new frontier that wipes off a bunch of old concepts"
    - Machiavelli69

    "Shogun was chess, vi was chequers rome was tiddlywinks and mtw2 musical chairs." - Swoosh So

  17. #17

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Dam, I was thinking I'd get this on mid range settings, but I now I know small unit size is same as normal on rome, I guess that just dropped to low :/

    Apart from that, this blog has made my day. Especially info abou maknig the annoying game unbalancing upgrades less useful.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzz3D
    That's an interesting solution to the gamespeed issue that retains the fast gameplay for those that want it.
    Crikey, I don't want to rain on your parade when you are making a rare upbeat post, but are you sure there is a solution to the gamespeed issue in the blog? I totally missed it on the first reading, read your post and went back - all I can find is a reference to four unit size settings, with the larger ones taking longer to play. But it's by no means obvious that a larger a unit size will be associated with slower movement speeds or kill rates. A larger unit size will lead to a longer game just because there is more to kill.

    Or am I missing something here?

  19. #19

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    Crikey, I don't want to rain on your parade when you are making a rare upbeat post, but are you sure there is a solution to the gamespeed issue in the blog? I totally missed it on the first reading, read your post and went back - all I can find is a reference to four unit size settings, with the larger ones taking longer to play. But it's by no means obvious that a larger a unit size will be associated with slower movement speeds or kill rates. A larger unit size will lead to a longer game just because there is more to kill.

    Or am I missing something here?
    Yes, it's hard to interpret what that paragraph means. Actually, I'm rather concerned that it says the "RTW speed" will be in there at all - because the standard RTW speed is a farce in my view. And if the only thing that is there to give you more time to react is more soldiers to kill, this sounds like very bad news indeed.

    And even if combat *is* slower with larger unit sizes - which seems doubtful when I think about it - then it's still no consolation for people with lower spec machines who can't play using the bigger unit sizes.

  20. #20
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    I remember one CA dev (in early RTW days) telling people just to use larger unit size if they thought killing speed was too high. I guess that opinion has not changed.


    CBR

  21. #21

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by CBR
    I remember one CA dev (in early RTW days) telling people just to use larger unit size if they thought killing speed was too high. I guess that opinion has not changed.


    CBR
    I'm afraid you're right. After all the hype, it sounds from this blog as though they have well and truly abandoned their original fanbase in favour of the RTS paradigm.

    I hope that's not the case, but that's what this sounds like to me.

    Which means that once again we would have to rely on the modders to try and find kludgy fixes to the ridiculous game speed. If that's how things turn out, I may finally have to part company with the TW series.

  22. #22
    Ricardus Insanusaum Member Bob the Insane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    I think the kill speed will have slowed down, at least a little. Otherwise there would be no time to complete those fancy new animations and kill moves...

  23. #23

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason
    Units Size & Game Pace: In M2TW we have set 4 playable unit sizes so that all types of game speeds can be realized. On small you will have a unit size slightly bigger than RTW’s normal that will play very similar, fast and furious. On normal you will get a unit size similar to MTW’s normal, that plays fast but gives you a little more time to incorporate more tactics. On large and huge you will still get games with a nice pace but they will be a tactical extravaganza showcasing lots of death and destruction.

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    Crikey, I don't want to rain on your parade when you are making a rare upbeat post, but are you sure there is a solution to the gamespeed issue in the blog? I totally missed it on the first reading, read your post and went back - all I can find is a reference to four unit size settings, with the larger ones taking longer to play. But it's by no means obvious that a larger a unit size will be associated with slower movement speeds or kill rates. A larger unit size will lead to a longer game just because there is more to kill.

    Or am I missing something here?
    I interpreted "game speed" to be both movement and fighting speed. The adjustable speed setting affects everything including momement, and all CA has to do is link the unit size selected to a speed setting. I'm assuming here that they have made reasonable walk/run speed ratios.

    Even if it isn't the case, we know the movement speeds have been slowed to some extent from the reports and brief video of the preview in Germany. It's also clear that the unit size doesn't change by a factor of 2 on each step as it did in RTW because small is larger than RTW normal and normal is similar to MTW normal. In RTW, going from normal (40) to large (80) skipped over MTW's normal (60). So I'm thinking that M2TW large will be around 80.

    Palamedes has played MTW online. I don't see how he can say large unit size will be a "tactical extravaganza" if it doesn't approach that of MTW. He was supposedly hired by CA to help them bring back the tactical gameplay that was lost in RTW. Since they are addressing things such as overlapping units and worrying about upgrades unbalancing the game, I can't imagine them sabotaging that effort by not providing a game speed that allows for substantial tactical thinking during a battle.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  24. #24
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Well, Puzz3D, no disrespect, but the world has turned upside down when you are more optimistic about M2TW than I. But in the text you quote there is no clear reference to their being settings for game speed - the main text only talks about adjusting unit size. I agree that an "adjustable speed setting" would be the easy and obvious solution to the debate about whether RTW was too fast (let the players pick the speed they are prefer). But do you have any information such a setting is in the game? What you quote does not convince me it is.

    I am more open to the idea that M2TW will play slower anyway, without an adjustable setting, but I'd need to play the demo to be sure.

  25. #25

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    Well, Puzz3D, no disrespect, but the world has turned upside down when you are more optimistic about M2TW than I. But in the text you quote there is no clear reference to their being settings for game speed - the main text only talks about adjusting unit size. I agree that an "adjustable speed setting" would be the easy and obvious solution to the debate about whether RTW was too fast (let the players pick the speed they are prefer). But do you have any information such a setting is in the game? What you quote does not convince me it is.

    I am more open to the idea that M2TW will play slower anyway, without an adjustable setting, but I'd need to play the demo to be sure.
    There was a big difference between normal and huge init size in RTW. GilJaysmith suggesed playing on huge in answer to players saying the gameplay was too fast. It didn't work. It was still too fast. Palamedes knows this. How can he be claiming that battles with large unit size in M2TW are a tactical extravaganza? His paragraph indicates that both types of players will be satisfied, by choosing the appropriate unit size. I think there has to be something to this other than simply larger unit size because that solution didn't work in RTW.

    I can see a gamespeed setting in the pictures. So, there is a gamespeed setting. I suspect it cannot be set below 1.0 by the player, but the game could do it based on the unit size selected. Palamedes is using the term "gamespeed". I hope he isn't making a new definition for this term for his blog.
    Last edited by Puzz3D; 10-05-2006 at 05:11.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  26. #26
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzz3D
    How can he be claiming that battles with large unit size in M2TW are a tactical extravaganza?
    If one sets the standards low enough, even slower killing/routing will mean wonders to tactics

    I really doubt its something advanced as different movement setting, just because of different unit size. I think its pretty simple: the more men per unit the more ranks and the longer it takes before a units gets killed off. And that certainly works in RTW and was IIRC what GilJaysmith was thinking about when he recommended increasing unit size.

    Some of us hardcore people thinks in terms of movement rate AND kill rate, but I guess some people just put that together into one term like battlespeed, gamespeed or whatever.


    CBR
    Last edited by CBR; 10-05-2006 at 00:52.

  27. #27
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Strangely, I find myself agreeing with Puzz (I say "strangely" because I've not been terribly optimistic person in regards to the game either). I also took Palamedes to mean that the actual battle speeds has been reduced, and not that the pace would be slower simply because units are larger. Were it otherwise, I'm quite certain Palamedes would've said so.

    As econ and others have pointed out, however, playing the demo should give us a pretty good idea one way or the other.
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

  28. #28

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Well overall seems like terrific news! I am estastic with the news of their efforts to solve some of the issues surrounding MP! I will remain optimistic and hope for the best!
    Hunter King George Visit the Realm of the Hunters:
    Proud participant of the Code of Honor. Have you signed the code?

  29. #29

    Default Re: Multiplayer blog is up

    Quote Originally Posted by Martok
    I also took Palamedes to mean that the actual battle speeds has been reduced, and not that the pace would be slower simply because units are larger. Were it otherwise, I'm quite certain Palamedes would've said so.
    I honestly think you guys are kidding yourselves. I cannot see CA taking the time to create different game speeds for different unit sizes. They've already told us a dozen times that kill speeds and so on are synchronized to soldier animations. How could they program different kill speeds in such circumstances? It would be a nightmare.

    Nope. This is just about larger unit sizes taking longer to defeat in my opinion. And I'm sceptical that this will lead to a "tactical extravaganza" for the simple reason that while there are more soldiers to kill, there also more soldiers to do the killing. So I can't see that larger unit sizes will have that much of an effect on the game.

    Which means in turn that the game is still going to be much too fast for the average tactical gamer. Naturally I'm hoping this is not the case, but it seems to be the logical conclusion from what's been said in this blog.

    Anyhow, as others have said, the demo will clear up a lot of these questions one way or another. Hopefully it's not too far away now...
    Last edited by screwtype; 10-05-2006 at 15:11.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO