Quote Originally Posted by roman_man#3
well, what the spaniards did during the war to destroy or demoralise the aztecs cannot be labeled as acceptable or unaccepltable, as it is i dunno, i think the word would be hippocritical, to say there are rules for war. so anything done in war cannot really be labeled acceptable or unacceptable. but like after they were destroyed, the monks destroying the books of the aztecs, as the books were considered evil, was unacceptable. it goes against everything god teaches. the bible says that god says every one is equal, yet the conquistadoes under the impression that christianity was the only solution for the wrongs of the world, basically made bets on what someone could do to an aztec, like cut them in half, like someone mentioned earlier. and betting is a sin too, is it not. as wrong as what the spaniards did after the war, im kinda happy that they destroyed the aztecs, because if the aztecs had gotten the tech for gunpowder, they would probably be a major blood thirsty ( due to the large population, even if the majority was from tenochtitlam )power aiming for POW to sacrifice.

i dunno, this might not make any sense, but i was on a raving chant, and had to get it off my chest.
Wakizashi mostly said it. Killing, soldier vs soldier was not what i was talking about, more about soldiers murdering civilians, not for any purpose but for sheer fun. And that is unacceptable, atleast for me.