Engineering Civil War

[Tony Furze]

Martok: yes , it was the low loyalty son and his brother was a co conspirator.

Hence the other query: when I clicked the stack with both in (+some troops) the low loyalty one came up as leader.

[Martok]

Martok: yes , it was the low loyalty son and his brother was a co conspirator.

Hence the other query: when I clicked the stack with both in (+some troops) the low loyalty one came up as leader.

Well of course the low-loyalty son would be in command if he had more command stars than his brother; but since you already know that, I'm assuming that they have equal numbers of stars, correct? If so, then he would be general if he was the last unit you placed in that particular stack.

Otherwise, he might have been the stack commander simply by virtue of being the older brother. Do you remember which son was the older of the two?

[Hemant A]

esp if you are in the situation in which COuntMRVHS found himself in as the hungarians. Having a civil war can sometimes be the only option to divide the attention of a combined attack of factions against you. I noticed the AI Egyptians and the AI Aragonese totally ignored the Spanish once they went into Civil war. The loyalists won and they joined hands with me and together we are the two great catholic superpowers in the Mediterrenean. Iam Sicily 1232 AD starting at Early. . . . . NOw the ARagonese are no more and the Egyptians are in a civil war of their own thanks to me destroying their Ribat in Sinai.......