never tryed arcade, so historical it is.
What is the diffrence?
Historical
Arcade
GAH!
never tryed arcade, so historical it is.
What is the diffrence?
I prefer historical battles as they give you the chance to use more advanced tactical strategies, and gives you more factors to consider when conducting a battle.
Last edited by Motep; 10-22-2006 at 19:34.
TosaInu shall never be forgotten.
This is the kind of game people take seriously. That's why historical is winning so easily..
My vote is for historical too, btw.
Some people prefer fatigue off because it really hampers the AI.
"It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s
this vote was over when it began. Arcade is too bad to have any good fun. Fair ground, fair play, and fair victory is so much more rewarding.
I'd hate to be a giraffe with a sore throat.
Self-proclaimed member who wishes more than anyone else that they looked like their avatar 2007.
Since he invented getting drunk?I agree. I makes them much more realistic. Since when did mankind never get tired or feel fear?
But yes, Historical/Custom for me, if I wanted arcade I'd play AOK or Empire Earth or something.
"Now, once more I must ride with my knights, to defend what was and the dream of what could be..."
- King Arthur, Excalibur
Bookmarks