Interesting, interesting. I see some people haven't yet grasped the principles of getting discussion going. (hint:being slightly insulting and accusatory works wonders)

Unvote:Myrddraal
Vote:Sigurd

I wasn't too suspicious of your argument against Kommodus round 1. But I am very surprised that no one has voted you yet this round. I believe if you were innocent there would have been some attempt by the mafia to get you lynched, you even said yourself "lynch me next round if I'm wrong".

2nd thing was Crazed Rabbits lengthy post. Drisos is proved innocent he says, so those who argued against him could be guilty. He completely fails to mention that Kommodus has been proved innocent as well, by his own logic Sigurd is far more likely to be mafia than anyone from round one. This strikes me as an attempt to take suspicion away from Sigurd.


@DC: the mafia likes suspicious people because they make easy lynches. Not lynching the suspicious people would defeat the point. And yes, there is pro bono in this game, any good townie will defend someone they think is innocent.

@GH: I like to see what they have too say for themselves first. Two posts for the price of one as it were.

@Crazed: As I said, why not Sigurd?

@Csar: you always vote for me no surprises there

Oh and before anyone says "well now you are trying to get sigurd lynched", 2 things: first I said they would have tried before now, and 2nd I'm not trying to get anyone lynched just trying to make discussion.