The Godfather, Part 2 [Concluded]

[Crazed Rabbit]

Eh, I'm most definately not the detective. If we have any doctors they can feel free to protect me, in case the mafia believes Sigurd and tries to off me.

Sigurd, You've got to have some more explaination for Ignoramous. How do we know you aren't just leading us around?

CR
PS I do heartily agree with Sigurd on the need to keep these games fun and not deadly serious.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

4 Points for consideration:

A. Possible Detective Action: Assuming you've cleared DW, PM him your results ( I noted no rule prohibition of this). Since he is unlynchable, he can serve as a deposit point for the investigations. And, if more than one detective contacts him, a target list can be developed.

B. All of our contentious votes, thus far, have involved Don C. There is no specific pattern of vengeance murders regarding votes for or against him, but I think we will need to explore these votes (R1, R2) as the field narrows.

C. Prole': He's been mentioned a time or two, but you are the only one to vote for Husar. What's your thought here?

D. Sigurd is coming over as the voice of reason regarding re-toning the discussion to produce evidence (and taking it less personally). In the CN game, he and cowhead were rewarding for beginning to steer the discussion in the correct direction with quick lynchings. On what basis do the Sigurd detractors think he's hinky? Explain a bit more please.

Point of Personal Privilege:

-- I am not a mafiosi. My reticence over the weekend was due to my attendance at the exemplificiation of the 4th degree, KofC, here in the Old Dominion. Feel free to Google it if you wish. We brought in a large class of 200+ new Sir Kinghts! I am back now, and happily analyzing votes/discussion. Also, since mafiosi were picked this time, and not at random, what Godfather in their correct senses would choose a guy who loves to analyze track records and publish them as one of his made men? Too many chances for a slip up.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

RIP Guru we hardly knew ye.

RTWguru:

Newbie to .org; very active poster in discussions on this thread. Voted for Don Corleone in R1, Did not vote in the runoff, Voted for Kommodus in R2, and lodged the only "No Lynch" vote of the entire game immediately prior to his own terminal lead poisoning.

p.s. Who's the fan of XXX who went for the scalding coffee thing?

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Hah, at least some of my accusations must have been accurate. Of course if I were mafia I would have accused a bunch of people anyway. Still, it looks like I accomplished what I intended.

[Csargo]

Vote: Ignoramus

I don't much like you anyways :P

[Silver Rusher]

Point of info for everyone: Revealing your role to single players at a time is forbidden. It is a rule included in the detective's PM, not in the thread.

[Masy]

I will drum up the Bandwagon then... come join me fellow townies... one, two, three, four.
Vote for Ignoramus
one, two, three four.. you know the rest.

Vote: Ignoramus

Why? He's not done anything...or is that what you're getting at?

I have my suspicions of several characters, but I shall wait until the oppertune moment before I divulge my info.

[Husar]

4 Points for consideration:

A. Possible Detective Action: Assuming you've cleared DW, PM him your results ( I noted no rule prohibition of this). Since he is unlynchable, he can serve as a deposit point for the investigations. And, if more than one detective contacts him, a target list can be developed.

Despite Silver saying that this is forbidden, if Divine Wind is the Godfather, this is a pretty stupid thing to do and gives me the idea that you may be a mafioso who had exactly this in mind.

B. All of our contentious votes, thus far, have involved Don C. There is no specific pattern of vengeance murders regarding votes for or against him, but I think we will need to explore these votes (R1, R2) as the field narrows.

I think now that Don C is not guilty because I do not believe he would use his wife as a cheap excuse to get out of the affair, if that isn't enough for anyone, he mentioned this problem in other game threads as well.

C. Prole': He's been mentioned a time or two, but you are the only one to vote for Husar. What's your thought here?

Yes, voting for such an innocent cute guy as me...
Well, I have neither anything against nor for Prole but I think her decision was also forged in the chat, details shall never be revealed.

Crazed Rabbit our detective has probably investigated me already and found me innocent.
Sasaki a Mafioso got lynched last round, while his companion Seamus Fermanagh… is still alive.
Both were chosen by our Godfather … Ignoramus.
Vote Ignoramus as I surely will get wiped out this round.

Let's try to apply some logic guesses here:
1. Sasaki might be mafia + one kill this round
2. Sigurd may be mafia + my reply to the first quote in this post
3. you were not wiped out last round, instead someone remotely suspicious got killed
4. Crazed Rabbit might be detective but denies any knowledge

Vote: Ignoramus for now.

[Dutch_guy]

Eh, I'm most definately not the detective. If we have any doctors they can feel free to protect me, in case the mafia believes Sigurd and tries to off me.

Sigurd, You've got to have some more explaination for Ignoramous. How do we know you aren't just leading us around?

CR
PS I do heartily agree with Sigurd on the need to keep these games fun and not deadly serious.

Well, there is no doctor.

Personally Sigurd, I'd like to know why you think Ignoramus is so guilty. His posting behavior is exactly the same as in other games, and he hasn't made any posts which contain a sufficient amount of data needed to find someone guilty in my opinion.

PS: Let me be the third one to agree, these games are meant to be fun as well as challenging.

PPS: just wanted to edit this message, I'm off to bed now, so I'll be back and ready tomorrow (afternoon)