Quote Originally Posted by Myrddraal
That would involve lynching about half the remaining living players. Sasaki seems to have accused anyone who questioned his logic along the line.

I didn't vote for Sasaki, because I really was not convinced at the time that he was mafia, but since then he's really been hard at work. When he posts a long bit of reasoning, he twists history beyond recognision, and when he posts a one liner, everyone jumps to follow him. God help this town if he really was mafia.

@Drisos, what do you think of Don C now? I know that if I dare to suggest his name again I'll be accused by Sasaki of going for the easy lynch, but I haven't forgotten the PM you recieved, and you've been proven innocent.
Myrdraal:

you have lodged exactly one active vote this entire game, joining the Day #2 plurality (8 votes) for Kommodus' lynching. Kommodus, along with Drisos were found innocent ex post facto by reason of the continuance of double mafia killings. Of the three opportunities out of five where you lodged a vote, two were abstentions -- hardly a decisive record. So the only lynching vote you made was made against one of two players whom we can confirm (now ) to have been innocent.

You post frequently, and argue with Sasaki's logic, yet you offer no alternative explanations of what is happening. You provide no direction for pressure or investigation save a return to the targets of earlier rounds, rounds in which you did not vote for that target when presented with the opportunity.

I am, and I think understandably, troubled by an active poster who refuses to take a stance in our voting. Whose abstentions do NOT prevent him from arguing suspicions and accusations. Reenk annoyed me in CN by abstaining almost all the time, but at least he didn't spend time hanging target markers on others while doing so.

What strategy are you playing at Myrdraal? So far, I am reading posts by someone stirring up bandwagons or trying to run them in certain directions without leaving a track record her/himself.....