Yes, agnosticism essentially rejects proof entirely, saying nothing can be proven, but it's basis for rejecting proof is no more sound than claiming there is no god.Originally Posted by Lemur
Yes, agnosticism essentially rejects proof entirely, saying nothing can be proven, but it's basis for rejecting proof is no more sound than claiming there is no god.Originally Posted by Lemur
I think I've already made my feelings clear about the use of the word "prove" in this context. Anybody who claims they can "prove" something in a chat board, or anybody who demands that something be "proved" in a chat board, well, they should at least lose style points.
Call it Lemur's Corollary to Godwin's Law.
Bookmarks