Quote Originally Posted by Navaros
A thread was made about murdering babies and then a "disclaimer" put into the original post that basically amounts to: "Although this thread is about murdering babies, please do not mention about the murdering of babies in this thread." That disclaimer is not the least bit reasonable.

My posts in this thread were not insulting, rather they are merely calling a spade a spade or more specifically, a murder of a baby a murder of a baby.
Since when did a bunch of cells get assigned the name "baby"? The young cells that are being used have already been thrown out, why is it so wrong to use them? Is it not in your opinion better that the dieing cells be used for something that could be constructive and help prolong and assist others?

As Rory said, if you consider a zygot a baby then most of the women you know are "babykillers". Guessing with your line of reasoning we need to just lock all women up, their all evil vile baby murdering scum.

Quote Originally Posted by TB666
Actually Fox did take his meds, that's why he is like that.
Ahh didn't know one of the side effects of drugs for treating parkinsons was shaking, ironic. I retract my previous statement, but still it is a pure political ploy to use M. J. Fox to attack your opponent.

Quote Originally Posted by Mongoose
Don't qoute me on this, but to my knowledge, embryonic stem cell research hasn't been funded very well in the past, so it's not exactly reasonable to say that it's a worthless field of research, based solely off of the lack of past results.
Funding is very limited in the USA. Thats one of the main reasons why the results are slow. But also why most major developments have happened overseas, quite sad.
_____________________
Speak softly and carry tactical nukes.
BigTex
Ridicolus
"Hilary Clinton is the devil"
~Texas proverb