Results 1 to 30 of 49

Thread: What could have been done better at Gettysburgh?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Jillian & Allison's Daddy Senior Member Don Corleone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    7,588

    Default Re: What could have been done better at Gettysburgh?

    First, Lee had put all his brigade & divisional commanders under strict orders NOT to engage the enemy. The fact that AP Hill, and Henry Heth (the corps & divisonal commanders that started the skirmish respectively) weren't flogged and court martialed afterwards is amazing.

    Anyway, in the first day, the CSA could have and should have won it outright. When the Union cavalry pickets finally did break, the CSA had some tremendous, though short lived, tactical advantages. However, for some reason, Old Baldy, Robert Ewell, decided to hold up at Cemetary Hill and would not press the attack. Had he, O.O. Howard's 12th corps almost certainly would have been overrun, putting Ewell on Hancock's 1st corps rear flank. The Union would have had to have withdrawn. Instead, Ewell ordered Early and company to hold up, allowing Sedgwick to come in and bolster Howard, ensuring the CSA didn't get any of the highlands to the south and east of town.

    On the 2nd day, the day Lee sent Longstreet to charge the roundtops, you have to look at just how good that terrain was. IF Longstreet had taken it, and the CSA could have mounted their Parrott guns up on top of those hills, the Union would have been in serious trouble. What's more, there's no reason to believe that if Longstreet hadn't delayed and stalled that he couldn't have actually taken it. He whined about about it for so long, his glum assessment became a self fulfilling prophecy.

    On the 3rd day, Pickett's charge defies logic. It's almost as though Lee was possessed. It was very uncharacteristic for him, as he was painfully aware of the numeric advantages the Union possessed and just how dear each and every casualty was to the CSA.

    On the Union side, there's a whole hatful of stupid things that they did. First, O.O. Howard, on the first day... Who orders their men to enter a densely wooded grove, then just stop? He's damn lucky he and his men survived that day and he very easily could have been wiped out. On the 2nd day, Sikes' adventures in the Peach Orchard border on criminal stupidity and disobediance. Meade had a fairly strong defensive line set up and Sikes decided to open a huge hole right at the lynch pin, because he wanted to impress some journalists he had along with him. He was damn lucky to have lost only his leg... McLaws and Lafyette had him surrounded on 3 sides and came this || close to pinching his entire corps off from the main union line. Not reinforcing the roundtops was incredibly stupid, and it's amazing that Chamberlain was able to hold.

    On the 3rd day, the Union sat back and waited. Given their shortsighted offensive maneuvers up until then, this was probably their wisest move thus far in the war. The only thing I don't understand is why they didn't have a counter-strike prepared for Pickett's charge. They knew it was coming for close to an hour, and once the 1st corps turned the tide at the bloody angle, they should have sprung... The CSA would have been divided in half and possibly the entire ANV would have been destroyed. They had to settle for chasing the hospital trains the following day, slim pickings at best.
    "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
    Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.

    "Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
    Strike for the South

  2. #2
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: What could have been done better at Gettysburgh?

    If we speak tactically about the battle one intresting question is ,what would have happened on the second day if Longstreet would have accepted General Hoods idea that instead of attacking against little round top with his division he would have moved around big round top and placed his artillery in there? That way he could have flanked the end of Union line and his artillery would have been in wonderfull position to support the division. I bet that if the Corps commander would have been Jackson instead Longstreet it would have happened.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  3. #3
    Probably Drunk Member Reverend Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Up on Cripple Creek
    Posts
    4,647

    Default Re: What could have been done better at Gettysburgh?

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
    On the 3rd day, the Union sat back and waited. Given their shortsighted offensive maneuvers up until then, this was probably their wisest move thus far in the war. The only thing I don't understand is why they didn't have a counter-strike prepared for Pickett's charge. They knew it was coming for close to an hour, and once the 1st corps turned the tide at the bloody angle, they should have sprung... The CSA would have been divided in half and possibly the entire ANV would have been destroyed. They had to settle for chasing the hospital trains the following day, slim pickings at best.
    Failing to pursue the Confederate army was one of Meade's greatest failings, and, if I recall correctly, one of the reasons he was finally fired from the command of the Army of the Potomac. I might be confusing Meade with a different general, but I believe this hesitance and fear of risk was a problem that dogged Meade for years; he refused to advance at a pace slower than a crawl, even when the odds were greatly in his favor, and he lost a great number of advantages because of this.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO