Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: About the Turks starting position

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: About the Turks starting position

    Jerusalem was under the Egyptian Caliphate not the Turks.
    Aracnid

  2. #2
    Kavhan Member Kavhan Isbul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Pliska
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: About the Turks starting position

    Quote Originally Posted by Aracnid
    Jerusalem was under the Egyptian Caliphate not the Turks.
    Are you sure? I think the Fataimids recaptured Jerusalem from the Seljuks only a few years before the First Crusade arrived there.

    I would personally like to see a strong Muslim power in the game, controlling the Holy Lands. Otherwise crusades will be dull. Maybe this is why the Seljuks and the Egyptians have a relatively easier starting position.

  3. #3
    Member Member Polemists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the Lou
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: About the Turks starting position

    I don't think turks have it that easy. My understanding from dev stuff I have read is that the Five starting factions (much like rome) are not just chosen because there catholic and therefore have the pope political aspect but are also chosen because they all not hard to start as. HRE probably being hardest of starting five.

    Also yes the turks do run into Egypt later on but I hardly think Egypt will be a push over.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO