Well it's not like they had been punished before. The cases that end with a penalty are usually notorious ones, but the real ammount of filesharing happens in relatively minimal ammounts between particular users as day by day exchange without much notice.Originally Posted by From the article on the original post
The truth is, that intellectual property (wich is of course a misleading name considering that most of the property's right characteristic don't apply) is an old institution decaying on a world that evolves towards common information more and more. Is a conservative institution, and I think it's just and right with some limitations, but it might no work anymore on the internet era. However renewing the way people use to transmit their work might also be a way to go through this an conserve intelectual property: like the world of music is doing now, adding more and more artists to the trade of files through internet.
The fact that he calls it a "practised behaviour" seems to show that he believes it's an accepted custom. We should also notice that the judge seems to be talking in abstract, not about this case, but about music downloading in general.Judge Paz Aldecoa of No. 3 Penal Court ruled that under Spanish law a person who downloads music for personal use can not be punished or branded a criminal. He called it "a practised behaviour where the aim is not to gain wealth but to obtain private copies".
However Spain is not ruled by common law or case law. Court rulings don't have that much importance.
This is a little more relevant, and a little extreme I believe. The only material affected by this "practised behaviour" is the one susceptible of being downloaded through the internet. This law must have a different end, a broader one.Justice Minister Juan Fernando Lopéz Aguilar says Spain is drafting a new law to abolish the existing right to private copies of material.
Bookmarks