First impressions on mp

[tibilicus]

Took Offensfe from that, Because I don't like People, to come here and tell us to leave.


We Trying to Help the Community Kid, but Like Someone said here Eariler, Mabye Puzz or Orda, not sure, If CA Actually Listen to the Old Vets, we won't be complaining right now. Eques, Why do you play SP/MP? Is it because of the Graphics Mabye? Mabye it becauses you want to see how good you are?


Anyhow, I see no good points in your post for me to talk about, so what I wrote above is it.

Ok were to start.


2) I wasn't remotley aware you even play mtw m8. If so the few MTW players I know don't know that.

3)Warman. Which side are you on. You played rtw more than any one here probably. So I don't see were your critisicm is coming from.

4) Warman, dont take it out on people like Equeus. There making a point. Please stop taking a side your clearly not on. You played RTW, you liked it. I don't see where your veiws are comign from or if your just trying to imrpess some of the members here. If so, your only liying to yourself.

m8, it's unfair to take it out on some one with a completly different veiw. If you want to say the same to me. I think MTW2 is an improvment from RTW. Im enjoying it. Equeas made a point. Don't be all up in his face blowing his words compelty out of proportion.


Tib

[Massi]

why do you all argue so long about what you do like, about what you don't like and about what you never played?

"the old vets" have a quite unanimous opinion. Many want to know how is MTW-2 before spending the money and ask in the forums... to the other old vets which could not resist and did buy first. What's wrong about it?

and if I have to say the truth, my opinon is somehow different from Tera's: I think that M2TW is a step toward the old Med, and back from Rome. Therefore I tend to be optimist.

[Stig]

Nah MTW2 is better then RTW, but then opinions differ.

Mind you if loads of old vets buy it, even Elmo will give it a try "hint hint"

[TosaInu]

May I hope that all harsh language is gone when I log back in 2 hours?

Like, not like. It's all fine with me. Voicing opinions based on feel, numbers, experience, dreams, bad dreams, I don't care. But keep the discussions clean and grant the other to play his game. This my Hulk p@wns your Spiderman talk is silly. You like Hulk: you watch Hulk. He likes Spid: he watches Spid.

Quit nagging each other with words: be happy that someone else buys this game, which in turn allows you to obtain the copy cheaper than it would be otherwise, if at all available.

And if you don't like it: voice in acceptable words why not, move to things you do like and quit telling others that they are not it.

I think all agree that there are problems with M2TW MP. How is CA supposed to fix that if they have to wade through these brawls?

[LadyAnn]

Nah MTW2 is better then RTW, but then opinions differ.

Mind you if loads of old vets buy it, even Elmo will give it a try "hint hint"

Elmo, where? I miss Elmo!

Annie

[Stig]

.com or simply at the Pond

[x-dANGEr]

Other than your own perception of bashing and of course, the way you dismiss things you never experienced so therefore do not understand. Since you never played STW online and certain members are making direct comparisons, why do you get the impression that you can convince them differently? A written response to your questions to prove the point is simply not enough is it? From your reply to Puzz3D's post that should be obvious, there is a counter to every argument and this could run and run until next year and longer. The simple truth is, no matter how much he tries to explain you will never agree with him. How could you? You don't know what he is talking about

Then, I guess we should just stop arguing. On the same sense, how can you be convinced when you haven't played RTW 1.5, and don't know the tactics/strategies in it. And also, it falls in the same sense, that you are talking bad of a game you haven't played, which AFAIK, I haven't done yet

At any cost, upon the request of others, this discussion as it seems is a dead end, and therefore I will stop it.

*END*

@Tib: To get this topic back on track.. Can you detail to us how your MP experience was? Thanks.

[tibilicus]

Hi X-Danger. To sumarize my experieince.

Overall feel much better than rome. More blanced feels more relastic so on.

Only bad points I have found is some times it's a little laggy. Only effected one of my many games others have had mimimal if not any lag. Cavalry a little but overpowerd but theres bound to be a few issues.

That's it in a nut shell.

[tootee]

Elmo, where? I miss Elmo!

Annie

elmo elmo elmo elmo.. sorry spam

blah couldnt get the game till 24th :( has FF started playing m2tw Ann?

[Gregoshi]

It is great to see you posting again tootee. Thanks a million for providing a link to that STW battle report. I'd forgotten about it. Twas a nice walk down memory lane.

The title of this thread mentions "first impressions" and with the game only being out about two weeks, impressions are about all that can be expected. Over the coming weeks and months with patches, tweaks and experience, more definitive pronouncements can be made as to what M2TW is or isn't.

In the meantime, for those of us who must wait until Christmas to get our copies, keep the impressions, good and bad, coming - impressions of the game, that it.

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

Ok were to start.

2) I wasn't remotley aware you even play mtw m8. If so the few MTW players I know don't know that.

3)Warman. Which side are you on. You played rtw more than any one here probably. So I don't see were your critisicm is coming from.

4) Warman, dont take it out on people like Equeus. There making a point. Please stop taking a side your clearly not on. You played RTW, you liked it. I don't see where your veiws are comign from or if your just trying to imrpess some of the members here. If so, your only liying to yourself.

m8, it's unfair to take it out on some one with a completly different veiw. If you want to say the same to me. I think MTW2 is an improvment from RTW. Im enjoying it. Equeas made a point. Don't be all up in his face blowing his words compelty out of proportion.


Tib

2. Yes I been saying that for Years and I made it Known. Again, If you Read my Posts,doubt you haved, you would known I played MTW/Vi on the unpatched Server

3.Because it something called Addcition. BHC growed, I got addiction to it, even though I didn't like the gameplay, I came back anyhow to start BHC.

4.Who Ever Said I like RTW? May I have Pics or Links Please? None? there you go. I'm backing my Fellow Vets.

m8, it is Fair. In the World of Debate. MTW2 is a slight imprvoement AI wise, yes I admit, but not much better.

[tibilicus]

2. Yes I been saying that for Years and I made it Known. Again, If you Read my Posts,doubt you haved, you would known I played MTW/Vi on the unpatched Server

3.Because it something called Addcition. BHC growed, I got addiction to it, even though I didn't like the gameplay, I came back anyhow to start BHC.

4.Tib, Isn't this suppose to be your final Piece here? I mean Last post, or mabye the post before that? Who Ever Said I like RTW? May I have Pics or Links Please? None? there you go. I'm backing my Fellow Vets, Not People like you,Tib or Eques..

m8, it is Fair. In the World of Debate, you ethier tough up and suck it up, or just don't argue at all. MTW2 is a slight imprvoement AI wise, yes I admit, but not much better.

And theres no such thing as adiction with out a cause. No one forced you to play rtw, you chose to. And the one you are yet to play which btw handles MP rather well.

Tib

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

No one forced you to play rtw, you chose to. And the one you are yet to play which btw handles MP rather well.

Tib

Go Get MTW/VI, Meet me on MTW/VI, lets do some games, and you see the difference. I played RTW because I wanted to move on, makes Sense?

I also be able to play MP on MTW2 Tib, if I could actually get some help logging on.

Back on Topic:


Cavarly is overpowered, when I did some custom games and such. I had a SP game of, 3 Cav units, 2 Heavy Cav, 1 of them being General Unit, and a few weaker inf unit .vs. a French Army of Armounded Sergeants and 1 General Bodygurad Unit. my 3 cav units took out the whole enitre force themsevles, after my 48 pesaent archers did their damage, and killing about 20 Armounded Sergeants. OverPowerded? IMO yes it is.

[x-dANGEr]

Hi X-Danger. To sumarize my experieince.

Overall feel much better than rome. More blanced feels more relastic so on.

Only bad points I have found is some times it's a little laggy. Only effected one of my many games others have had mimimal if not any lag. Cavalry a little but overpowerd but theres bound to be a few issues.

That's it in a nut shell.

NOoononooOOOooOo!

I said "detail".. Details please, details!

[Monarch]

I'm backing my Fellow Vets,

Thanks, I needed a good laugh