patch wishlist

[PorT_Lobo]

Please CA! Take a good look at Campaign AI!!!

AI don't garrison settlements making to easy to human to conquer it!! And AI is few agressive and almost no attack our bigger armys!!

[Valpo]

Anyone else notice the bug with the time.

My second king who was in his 20's at the start of the game is about 60 years old now and the game says the year is 1222. (Remember we start in 1080) It seems like the guys age on a 6 month turn and the game runs on a 2 year turn.

Also the faction leader switching to the King's son after his son comes of age would be nice. Sure make it easier to marry princesses.

[Daveybaby]

I dont think its a bug, so much as a 'design compromise'.
Note that the seasons only advance 6 months per turn also. I think there was a decision at some point to increase the number of years per turn to 2, hence the counter only showing turns instead of years so as not to highlight the discrepancy.

There are already mods around to change this back to 6 months per turn.

[Valpo]

I dont think its a bug, so much as a 'design compromise'.
Note that the seasons only advance 6 months per turn also. I think there was a decision at some point to increase the number of years per turn to 2, hence the counter only showing turns instead of years so as not to highlight the discrepancy.

There are already mods around to change this back to 6 months per turn.

Actually I found out how to do it, its in the desrc-stat file or whatever its called. Anyways I went in there to unlock all the factions and saw the time scale thing and I was like . . . hmm I'll bet thats it. . .

Now if they would just fix the stupid faction heir thing so princesses actually have a use.

[Rothe]

"Few" things:

Inquisition is broken, it needs a major fix.

- More ways to protect generals, why not including priests in armies/cities. This may already be helping, but not nearly enough. I would also include option for voluntary excommunication instead of getting burned for faction leader and faction heir.

- Less randomness in the actions of the inquisiotion, and maybe less activity as well. I understand it is a fun part in the game and needs to be a bit threathening, but now it is a major pain and detracts from a good gaming atmosphere.

- Maybe even make it work so that it does not enter lands that have over < X % catholics >, if at all possible. The % could be high, like 95%+. On the same note, it could ignore characters over a certain piety level (generals / priests) and ignore merchants alltogether (could already be so).

Battles are a bit weird still:

- The freeze effect when AI is faced with certain type of armies (mostly I guess archer heavy armies) needs to be removed.

- Cavalry charges need to be more intuitive to work properly. I mean that if you select cavalry and double click an enemy unit, it should mostly work out OK. And with this I mean that the lances should come out, which now is a bit random and too much dependent on the distance to the enemy.

- Archer targeting needs to be fixed. They should be able to consistently fire over the first rank of enemy troops at a selected target. Now they fire at rank 1 and that is it. Even if rank 1 has 2 men, all the archers fire at them ever if ordered to fire units behind the 2 men...

- Movement in formation needs to be more consistent. I had trouble with moving a formation of 2 crossbowmen forward so that they are level with each other. Breaking firing sequence when ordered to move could help with it.

- Taking walls in sieges is lagged somehow, not sure what is the problem exactly. Also, AI sometimes tries to take settlements with hopeless siege equipment.

Campaign AI:

- The AI needs to be less agressive in attacking player with small stacks.

- The AI needs to keep some armies back to protect lands adjacent to peaceful nations. Otherwise the player can take a settlement with very little trouble and recover from losses before the AI can strike back. Each settlement does not need a big army, but at least castles could be defended better.

Unit stats:

- Only some weirdness here. Why do billmen have default defence value that is lower/ equal to peasants. Even with armor it was not much above 15 attack / 3 defense. Or, is this just some oddity in the game mechanics? I still felt the billmen performed reasonably well, but the stat card says the defense is low.

Agents:

- merchants could maybe have a bit higher income boost. Maybe just add a static sum to the level1 merchants that stays the same regardless of the exp. Something like +10 for each of them. Now they are not worth the trouble in the beginning because of the cost and the possibility of losing them to foreign merchants (not so small possibility either); later they are not significant anymore. Also, if possible, merchants could act as emissaries that can _only_ make trade right deals (including money compensation).

Years/Turns:

- I would prefer a simple 1 year / one turn system so that I see the actual year listed on the campaign screen. Also, some aging bugs are there I think.



All in all, I have to say that MTW2 seems like a great game. Actually that is just why I am keen to want even more from it because of the awesome potential.

[SoxSexSax]

1) MP lag. It's horrendous. 2v2s are barely playable...I don't even want to think about how bad a 3v3 would be. Serious work needed here.

2) Movement speed on campaign map is too short. It does not take 6 months to travel from York to London!

3) Kill speed in battle feels too quick (again). Most melees are decided in seconds.

4) AI far too willing to stand still under archer fire. This is true even in battles where the "passive AI" bug does not seem to be in effect.

[Fearless]

Troop deployment in Castles/towns before battle commences. Many times its impossible to drag a unit for positioning as the pink markers fail to show and when on occassions they do the unit doesn't appear. Been playing since Shogun so I know the limitations on unit placement in cities. But this is really bad now!!