Org Mobile Site
Hmm interesting leading case.
In Poland;
1) Dead animal is not animal anymore. Sex with meat (cause dead deer is mostly meat) is like sex with doll - allowed but persersing.
2) Sex with body is being punished too - but In my opinion rather with human body than with animal body.
I think in Poland this defense tactic would work, but I think that he could be sentenced for some minor crimes.
In Poland;
1) Dead animal is not animal anymore. Sex with meat (cause dead deer is mostly meat) is like sex with doll - allowed but persersing.
2) Sex with body is being punished too - but In my opinion rather with human body than with animal body.
I think in Poland this defense tactic would work, but I think that he could be sentenced for some minor crimes.
Your title is unfair Lemur...
The man is arguing that his sodomizing of a deer carcass is not the same thing as sodomizing a living deer.
The title implies some incoherent deceit on part of the guilty party and his counsel. There is no incoherent deceit however...
The title "Is having sex with a dead deer significantly different from having sex with a live deer?" would be more apt...
The man is arguing that his sodomizing of a deer carcass is not the same thing as sodomizing a living deer.
The title implies some incoherent deceit on part of the guilty party and his counsel. There is no incoherent deceit however...
The title "Is having sex with a dead deer significantly different from having sex with a live deer?" would be more apt...
Originally Posted by :
(..) a previous conviction in 2005 for shooting dead a horse called Bambrick. So that he could have sex with it.
(..) a previous conviction in 2005 for shooting dead a horse called Bambrick. So that he could have sex with it.
Ah yes, the "roast turkey" defense. That should get alot of sympathy from the jury. 
Originally Posted by Kanamori:
Assuming that there are laws against necrophilia that included animal corpses, it would be stupid to have it overlapping w/ beasiality. That would be charging him twice for the same crime, as opposed to giving a more severe punishment for sex with a deer corpse. If he did get convicted, the implications would result in moronic interpretations of existing laws, like animal abuse. So, if he was only charged w/ beastiality, then they messed up and don't have a chance to convict for something that was illegal and that he did do.
I think he was going to get a larger sentence for the bestiality because it was his 2nd offense...poor Bambrick lolAssuming that there are laws against necrophilia that included animal corpses, it would be stupid to have it overlapping w/ beasiality. That would be charging him twice for the same crime, as opposed to giving a more severe punishment for sex with a deer corpse. If he did get convicted, the implications would result in moronic interpretations of existing laws, like animal abuse. So, if he was only charged w/ beastiality, then they messed up and don't have a chance to convict for something that was illegal and that he did do.
Okay so the story doesn't say whether the dead deer he humped was a male or a female. If it was a female I don't see what the poblem is, at least he's not a gay freak!!!11
Originally Posted by Xiahou:
Ah yes, the "roast turkey" defense. That should get alot of sympathy from the jury.
Especially now we're near Thanksgiving. Ah yes, the "roast turkey" defense. That should get alot of sympathy from the jury.
Anyone know what Leviticus says on this one?
While I'll say that this is *SICK* in a most profound way. He's more of a sex driven vulture, he had sex with carrion... it would be like sticking your wang into a T-Bone for pleasure. Although, obviously someone caught him in the act, and so he should be charged for public exposure.
Ahh I would forget?
Was that deer adult or not :)
Was that deer adult or not :)
Originally Posted by Xiahou:
Ah yes, the "roast turkey" defense. That should get alot of sympathy from the jury.
Who doesn’t “love” turkey? Ah yes, the "roast turkey" defense. That should get alot of sympathy from the jury.
I'm suddenly reminded of something Fragony said, in a thread about a guy who molested a pitbull.
I wonder if we'll be seeing him around anytime soon.
I wonder if we'll be seeing him around anytime soon.
I really wish that this thread wasn't so damn funny.
As to the "how' questions, I would say that the deer was most likely at a stage of decomposition where its meat was soft enough to
Okay, I need to stop. Point is, it is doubtful that he would have cared what sex the Deer was; he would have concentrated more on the condition of its thighs.
As to the "how' questions, I would say that the deer was most likely at a stage of decomposition where its meat was soft enough to
Okay, I need to stop. Point is, it is doubtful that he would have cared what sex the Deer was; he would have concentrated more on the condition of its thighs.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by AndresTheCunning:
I do admire this lawyer though...
I'd like to be there when he and the prosecution, um, lock horns. I do admire this lawyer though...
But what about the emotions of the carcass? Will it need intensive therapy? Who will pay for all that? And it's parents? How do they feel? And the owner? They must be in shock after they heard about what happened to their beloved deer? And the children! Think about the children!
On a side note: Will they still serve meat to adult male passengers on airplanes? I mean, chances are big there's a homopyronecrobeastialist on the plane! Imagine someone abusing his hot piece of chicken while sitting next to the children! The children !
On a side note: Will they still serve meat to adult male passengers on airplanes? I mean, chances are big there's a homopyronecrobeastialist on the plane! Imagine someone abusing his hot piece of chicken while sitting next to the children! The children !
I don't know if it is bestiality or if it should be prosecuted under the law according to that statute. if it is, i use lamb skin condoms, so technically i am committing 3-way bestiality every time i have sex with my girlfriend.
we are no longer allowed to prosecute people for consentual hetero/homosexual sexual acts or masturbation, so as long as there is no non-consentual physical harm to a living thing, i think the law in that regard falls flat. our sexual license tends to trump to will of the society that we live in, so i do not think that an arbitrary ruling attacking one form of anti-social, depraved behavior should succeed if it ignores others for political reasons. they might be able to get him on other grounds such as health code violations or expositionism.
just some thoughts.
we are no longer allowed to prosecute people for consentual hetero/homosexual sexual acts or masturbation, so as long as there is no non-consentual physical harm to a living thing, i think the law in that regard falls flat. our sexual license tends to trump to will of the society that we live in, so i do not think that an arbitrary ruling attacking one form of anti-social, depraved behavior should succeed if it ignores others for political reasons. they might be able to get him on other grounds such as health code violations or expositionism.
just some thoughts.
Is the judge going to order him to undergo cold turkey treatment?
Originally Posted by Pannonian:
Is the judge going to order him to undergo cold turkey treatment?
Whatever the outcome, it behoofs him to seek professional help.Is the judge going to order him to undergo cold turkey treatment?
I've herd that's a good ideer.
Originally Posted by Lemur:
I've herd that's a good ideer.
I've herd that's a good ideer.
I doen’t think I will be trying it.
Originally Posted by Lemur:
I've herd that's a good ideer.
I've herd that's a good ideer.
Originally Posted by Scurvy:
Originally Posted by yesdachi:
Who doesn’t “love” turkey?
Exactly! If his lawyer can convincingly argue that convicting the defendant would lead to the loss of our right to make sweet love to roast turkey- no jury in the world would convict him. Who doesn’t “love” turkey?
Originally Posted by Xiahou:
Exactly! If his lawyer can convincingly argue that convicting the defendant would lead to the loss of our right to make sweet love to roast turkey- no jury in the world would convict him.
Gives a new perspective to the product, Stovetop turkey stuffing. Exactly! If his lawyer can convincingly argue that convicting the defendant would lead to the loss of our right to make sweet love to roast turkey- no jury in the world would convict him.
Ahh it mention me Scary Movie 2 and that guys with chicken :)
Originally Posted by KrooK:
Ahh it mention me Scary Movie 2 and that guys with chicken :)
Eh?Ahh it mention me Scary Movie 2 and that guys with chicken :)
Dead deers don't say no, some people.....
On a side note: one of our most famous writers confessed that he once 'had sex' with a steak. Would that count as bestiality too ? 
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by doc_bean:
On a side note: one of our most famous writers confessed that he once 'had sex' with a steak. Would that count as bestiality too ?
That would count as mushroom-sause I think....On a side note: one of our most famous writers confessed that he once 'had sex' with a steak. Would that count as bestiality too ?
Who was it by the way?
Originally Posted by Fragony:
That would count as mushroom-sause I think....
Who was it by the way?
Tom Lanoye, iirc he wrote it in one of his books and later stated that it was a true story.That would count as mushroom-sause I think....
Who was it by the way?
Thread Ratings provided by
Thread Ratings (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO