HomopyronecrobeastialityNecrobestiality?
HomopyronecrobeastialityNecrobestiality?
Sometimes I slumber on a bed of roses
Sometimes I crash in the weeds
One day a bowl full of cherries
One night I'm suckin' on lemons and spittin' out the seeds
-Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers, Lemons
...resulting in spontaneous human combustion.Originally Posted by JimBob
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
Your title is unfair Lemur...
The man is arguing that his sodomizing of a deer carcass is not the same thing as sodomizing a living deer.
The title implies some incoherent deceit on part of the guilty party and his counsel. There is no incoherent deceit however...
The title "Is having sex with a dead deer significantly different from having sex with a live deer?" would be more apt...
But what about the emotions of the carcass? Will it need intensive therapy? Who will pay for all that? And it's parents? How do they feel? And the owner? They must be in shock after they heard about what happened to their beloved deer? And the children! Think about the children!
On a side note: Will they still serve meat to adult male passengers on airplanes? I mean, chances are big there's a homopyronecrobeastialist on the plane! Imagine someone abusing his hot piece of chicken while sitting next to the children! The children !
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
I don't know if it is bestiality or if it should be prosecuted under the law according to that statute. if it is, i use lamb skin condoms, so technically i am committing 3-way bestiality every time i have sex with my girlfriend.
we are no longer allowed to prosecute people for consentual hetero/homosexual sexual acts or masturbation, so as long as there is no non-consentual physical harm to a living thing, i think the law in that regard falls flat. our sexual license tends to trump to will of the society that we live in, so i do not think that an arbitrary ruling attacking one form of anti-social, depraved behavior should succeed if it ignores others for political reasons. they might be able to get him on other grounds such as health code violations or expositionism.
just some thoughts.
Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 11-17-2006 at 17:41.
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Is the judge going to order him to undergo cold turkey treatment?
Whatever the outcome, it behoofs him to seek professional help.Originally Posted by Pannonian
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
I've herd that's a good ideer.
Originally Posted by Lemur
![]()
Bookmarks