View Poll Results: Marks out of 10 for M2TW

Voters
139. This poll is closed

  • 10

    10 7.19%

  • 9

    52 37.41%

  • 8

    41 29.50%

  • 7

    21 15.11%

  • 6

    6 4.32%

  • 5

    3 2.16%

  • 4

    3 2.16%

  • 3

    1 0.72%

  • 2

    0 0%

  • 1

    2 1.44%
Results 1 to 30 of 51

Thread: Rate the game: the initial verdict of Orgahs

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 11-17-2006, 16:47 #13
    danfda
    danfda is offline
    Member Member danfda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dispensing plasmids one bacteria at a time...
    Posts
    260



    Default Re: Rate the game: the initial verdict of Orgahs

    I'd like to have gone 7.5, but I couldn't, so it was a 7. Very fun, much better AI (camp map and battle, IMO), beautiful graphics, runs very smoothly on my machine. I still have quibbles about some small things (lack of titles, reaction time for units when they take so goshdarn long to respond to your commands, etc) but overall I think it is a vast improvement over Rome. Still prefer the original MTW, but I like this one too.

    EDIT: Ooh, and the lack of unit roster diversity too. Ugh. I can't see why it had to change so much from MTW, but ugh, just ugh.
    Last edited by danfda; 11-17-2006 at 16:48.
    "Its just like the story of the grasshopper and the octopus. All year long the grasshopper kept burying acorns for winter while the octopus mooched off his girlfriend and watched TV. Then the winter came, and the grasshopper died, and the octopus ate all his acorns and also he got a racecar. Is any of this getting through to you?"

    --Fry, Futurama, the show that does not advocate the cool crime of robbery
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO