View Poll Results: Marks out of 10 for M2TW

Voters
139. This poll is closed
  • 10

    10 7.19%
  • 9

    52 37.41%
  • 8

    41 29.50%
  • 7

    21 15.11%
  • 6

    6 4.32%
  • 5

    3 2.16%
  • 4

    3 2.16%
  • 3

    1 0.72%
  • 2

    0 0%
  • 1

    2 1.44%
Results 1 to 30 of 51

Thread: Rate the game: the initial verdict of Orgahs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Typing from the Saddle Senior Member Doug-Thompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    2,455

    Default Re: Rate the game: the initial verdict of Orgahs

    I gave this puppy a 10.

    Is it perfect? No. Is it the best historical strategy game on the market, in any format? Absolutely. Is it a vast improvement over RTW in every regard? Absolutely.

    Were our complaints and requests taken seriously and addressed? Absolutely.

    Did CA turn away from fantasy and drop laughably stupid units like Egyptian chariots in Roman times and bare-breasted warrior witch women who shriek while their hair's on fire? Yes, Yes YES, thank the mighty gods of computer simulation, yes. Bull warriors and such nonsense have disappeared, an absolute triumph in the fight for plausible historical seriousness and not having your game spoiled by obvious, ludicrous fantasy elements.

    The tactical combat is not up to the realism and detail of such hard-core sims as Combat Operations, for instance, but it's far, far better than RTW. Movement and kill rates now make generalship in these battles mean something.

    Last night, I made a mistake in a battle and the AI quickly and appropriately punished me for it. That was refreshing. I'd left my general's unit alone, something I commonly did on RTW, and the enemy's crusader knights lunged for him. It was too massive an assault to be random. I had to fight hard and won the battle, but lost my general. I also had time, though not much, to do something.

    This game is head and shoulders above RTW, it's only competitor at this level of history-based gameplay.
    Last edited by Doug-Thompson; 11-21-2006 at 17:18.
    "In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns."

  2. #2

    Default Re: Rate the game: the initial verdict of Orgahs

    I'm not allowed to vote in this due to my lowly forum status - but I have been playing Total War since Shogun was released and I rate it as a 9.

    Sure there are some gameplay issues that could be improved, but the amount of enjoyment I've had out of the game in the first week and a half makes it worth a 9 even when there is room for improvement.

    I did prefer the old style campaign map (the one in M:TW) as I felt it had a better atmosphere and the slightly gamey presentation of the new one doesn't really fit with the gritty attempt at realism in the battles themselves. But it's not an enjoyment wrecker, just a matter of preference.

    Got my money's worth already - what more can I ask for (well, ok a patch or two would be nice).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO