I've been on the org for awhile, including a stint as a glorious assistant moderator in the Backroom, with scars to prove it.
People have a catalog of arguments when their posts get edited or deleted and they get disciplined, one of the most popular is "I have the freedom of speech." In most cases they are referring to the 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution. As a side note, people in the Netherlands, Great Britain, Germany, and France have invoked the 1st Amendment to mean freedom of speech in their country; so it's fair to say that that Amendment's standards are ubiquitous.
Okay, here's the contoversial part. The First Amendment guarantee only applies to state action. In other words, if a private party, such as the org, deletes your post, edits it or disciplines you for what you said, the freedom of speech doesn't apply. A private entity, such as the org, may limit speech however it wants, period.
That means that when the glorious moderators edit you post, delete it and/or discipline you, it isn't a free speech issue. The way free speech works is simple, if a private entity censors your speech you are free to leave and start your own private entity and say whatever you want.
Note to the glorious mods. I posted this here because it relates to how people react when they are edited and to how the org rules work. Feel free to move, edit, or delete this post.
Bookmarks