Poll: Would You Pay Extra for enhanced MP? If so, how much?

Results 1 to 30 of 67

Thread: Would You Pay for MultiPlayer?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7

    Default Re: Would You Pay for MultiPlayer?

    I would pay for multiplayer, but I don't think it would really work for this game as is. What would you have, a multiplayer that was solely available for people paying? The numbers who play for "free" aren't that large as is. It might work for some massive campaign, but I don't really think that would work too well either. People always say a multiplayer campaign would be great, but I never really see how it would work for 99% of people. You can't have a campaign that has people constantly being substituted, nor can you expect any arbitrary group of people to finish it. Some kind of reward system for winning games (gaining resources etc) might work, but I'd suspect it would more reward time played instead of ability and so fielding better armies.

    What I would like most is something like the automated ladder matches in WC3/CoH etc and regular balance patches so that it doesn't become just a game of who can build the most exploitative army.

    As an aside I've often toyed with the idea of writing some kind of STW/MTW style web based campaign and using the game for the battles.

    Anyway, I've gone completely off topic as usual...
    Last edited by NihilisticCow; 11-20-2006 at 01:48.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO