Results 1 to 30 of 35

Thread: Unusually weak and strong units

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Dorkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    464

    Default Unusually weak and strong units

    1. JHI (12/10 or so) have very weak stats, but do very well in melee against other inf. They get crushed by cav 1on1, but then so too do most other units.

    2. Vargangian Guard (20/15) have ridicluously good stats, but lose to almost everything.

    Something else must be going on here. JHI and VG both have armor piercing, so that can't explain the difference. I was thinking perhaps JHI have better range, so more of their troops can engage, but it's hard to tell.

    Has anyone else identified unusually weak or strong units (given the stats)? It seems to me that the best way of predicting how powerful a unit is, is basically the price. It also seems that the stats on the printed charts seem more accurate than the stats in game. For example, the lancer seems to consistently beat other cav that have the same stats. On the printed chart, the lancer is superior (don't hav eit in front of me, so don't rmemeber how much).

    This game seems quite rushed.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    My Mercenary Free Company Men at Arms seem to terribly suck at all levels. They can't even hold their own against zero experience pavise crossbows or handgunners. Whereas my Free Company Longbow men can hold walls against any foe. I keep wondering why their stats look pretty good, but they get their arse handed to them by anyone.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    Venetian Heavy Infantry are awesome, I've yet to see them lose 1 on 1 with another infantry unit. I can't wait to get them, musketeers, some crusader knights and artillery so I can rule the battlefields.

  4. #4
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    Crusader knights aren't that great (they are a crusade merc unit). Order knights (Hospitallers, Templars, Teutons) I haven't taken afeild yet.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  5. #5
    Praeparet bellum Member Quillan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,109

    Default Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    Based on what Orda Khan found in his comparisons, what seems to make the Janissary Heavy Infantry (and the Danish one, whose name I can't remember) so effective is their reach. They lose a lot of men on impact, but once they kill everyone who can reach them, they pretty much wipe up everyone else because they can't be touched anymore.

    With the Varangian Guard, what I've noticed is that they attack vvvveerrrrryyyyy sllllooooowwwwwlllllyyyyyyyyy. They work pretty well as flankers, though. I've switched over to dismounted Byzantine lancers and dismounted latinkon for heavy infantry in my Byzantine game.

    The Byzantine top end horse archer, the Vardariotai, is extremely good. They wear armor, by default I think their melee is 11 and missile is 9, fast moving, good morale and good stamina.
    Age and treachery will defeat youth and skill every time.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member Dorkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    Thanks Quillan.

    Very interesting, but also very annoying. How are we supposed to figure out which unit is superior, if not by unit stats? Or at least some qualitiative description of a unit's abilities?

    I don't remember the ratings of JHI and VG on the printed chart -- does the chart do better in approximating unit combat value? Or do we simply look at unit cost as a proxy of combat value?

    Very annoying.

  7. #7

    Thumbs down Re: Unusually weak and strong units

    Quote Originally Posted by Dorkus
    1. JHI (12/10 or so) have very weak stats, but do very well in melee against other inf. They get crushed by cav 1on1, but then so too do most other units.

    2. Vargangian Guard (20/15) have ridicluously good stats, but lose to almost everything.

    Something else must be going on here. JHI and VG both have armor piercing, so that can't explain the difference. I was thinking perhaps JHI have better range, so more of their troops can engage, but it's hard to tell.

    Has anyone else identified unusually weak or strong units (given the stats)? It seems to me that the best way of predicting how powerful a unit is, is basically the price. It also seems that the stats on the printed charts seem more accurate than the stats in game. For example, the lancer seems to consistently beat other cav that have the same stats. On the printed chart, the lancer is superior (don't hav eit in front of me, so don't rmemeber how much).

    This game seems quite rushed.
    You're right, for example in my game early handgunners have a higher defence skill (8) to JHI even though JHI's are an elite unit. The same also applies to the Quprologu (sp?) who have the same defence skill as medium HA like the Sipahis.

    Am in a middle of campaign but can someone tell how good the Jannisary Musketeers are? I have a suspcion they might have better defence stats then most heavy infantry units...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO