It's a small thing, but I'm glad there are not prevalent, laughably stupid units in this game, like Egyptian chariots in Roman times in RTW. There are no naked cannibal redhead warrior women either, far as I can tell.
It's a small thing, but I'm glad there are not prevalent, laughably stupid units in this game, like Egyptian chariots in Roman times in RTW. There are no naked cannibal redhead warrior women either, far as I can tell.
Dont forget druids and head hurlers. Sometimes I wonder what those guys were smoking when they came up with some of those units.
My wife could take a CRWW anytime, anywhere.Originally Posted by Whacker
They were smoking the same thing as druids and head hurlers.Dont forget druids and head hurlers. Sometimes I wonder what those guys were smoking when they came up with some of those units.
All kidding aside, there was real danger that CA would go down the fantasy road. For now, the danger seems averted.
Last edited by Doug-Thompson; 11-21-2006 at 17:26.
Well the name you chose *is* Whacker.
![]()
Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pintenOriginally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
Down with dried flowers!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Finally!!! SOMEONE who got my real intent!Originally Posted by Vladimir
You know I've been using this nick (and another) since the days of Action Quake 2, and with a handful of exceptions everyone kept referring to me as "yu lamr italien hitman!11"
Back on topic.. You know what the worst part is, I didn't know how to truthfully respond to my wife's incredulous query. Any suggestions?![]()
tell here you have a few cannabilistic redheads in mind and were thinking of inviting them round for menage a troi ?
tell her to make you a sandwich.![]()
Give a man fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Nice ones
But for one terrible moment, Doug-Thompson I thought you discovered somewhere on the MTW II map some eggie chariots ...![]()
![]()
![]()
Cicero, Pro Milone"Silent enim leges inter arma - For among arms, the laws fall mute"
Probably right at this point. I'll show her the rest of the thread when she gets back from shopping with the in-laws. After almost 4 years I doubt she'd kill her pet slav... I mean loving husband, I still have SOME utility use left.Originally Posted by Doug-Thompson
Cheers!
Tell her you suddenly developed the 'Prolific' trait![]()
General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmaney Melchett: That's the spirit, George. If nothing else works, then a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Uh, sorry to burst your bubble Doug but the Timurids have elephants with cannons... And to complicate matters, Egypt also will have Camels with lazers to balance it out.Originally Posted by Doug-Thompson
If I wanted to be [jerked] around and have my intelligence insulted, I'd go back to church.
-Bill Maher
Originally Posted by PaulTa
Believe it or not, there were camels with small cannons on them in Central Asia during this time period, and elephants too.
However, I'll concede the point. I still contend, however, that the chariots were a game spoiler for me in RTW. It was just ludicrous, and there was no getting away from them, really. I never played Eqypt as a faction in RTW, and chariots were the main reason.
You forgot a few other units and special moves.Originally Posted by PaulTa
1. The French trademark "mass surrender" special attack.
2. The Scottish Highlander mounted-Elephants with catapults strapped to their backs, that sling chariots anointed with the essence of unicorn farts and fairy giggles, that have an area of affect on impact that cause enemy cavalry to charge cohesively. Alternate fire mode causes them to sprout ladders which act like helicopter blades, giving them the ability to perform aerial attacks.
3. The ultra-super-special-secret mode. Press up up down down left right left right a b gives you tactical nuclear warhead carrying peasants, the only downside is that the explosion doesn't affect routing units.
Cheers!
While red headed cannible women were pretty left field. There were druidic guards that fuaght for the gualic tribe of Cenabum. They were noted by many historic acounts. As for chariots the Egyptions didn't use them. But there was little about egypt that was real. CA for some reason created a high period egypt instead of a Ptolemiac greek egypt. But the selucids used scythed chariots still, and the pontics on occasion too. The Casse and briton tribes used chariots also.
Though if you don't think they have some creative units this time, go check out hungary and the muslim factions. There's battle field assasins, Sherwood Archers, Hashin's, and cannon armed war elephants. There's always been something refreshing about near mythical units in historic games. Let us never forget "Bigdaddy" in Age of Empires 1.
Last edited by BigTex; 11-21-2006 at 22:12.
Wine is a bit different, as I am sure even kids will like it.
"Hilary Clinton is the devil"BigTex
~Texas proverb
I rather enjoy the 'just this side of impossible' units myself. After a long day of slaughter and massacring the hordes of peasants with spears the AI hurls at me, its good to watch cannonophants blasting huge holes in enemy formations.
Sherwood archers are cool to, I always liked Robin Hood ;)
Tallyho lads, rape the houses and burn the women! Leave not a single potted plant alive! Full speed ahead and damn the cheesemongers!
It seems there are Orcs in the game after all.
http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showp...9&postcount=25
General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmaney Melchett: That's the spirit, George. If nothing else works, then a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
All these factions did actually use chariots to some degree. For the Seleucids and Pontics they were mainly an attempt to break the phalanx-phalanx stalemate, as a weapon of disruption.Originally Posted by BigTex
The chariot archers are wrong, though. The Assyrians were the last to ever use them in the middle east, and I don't think the British celts fought like that. It would have been much more accurate to give them javelins.
I actually think it was because most people have more misconceptions of antiquity then of the middle ages. People expected to see Egyptian chariots, period. In MTW2? People expect to see kilts...All kidding aside, there was real danger that CA would go down the fantasy road. For now, the danger seems averted.
[QUOTE=Kralizec]All these factions did actually use chariots to some degree. For the Seleucids and Pontics they were mainly an attempt to break the phalanx-phalanx stalemate, as a weapon of disruption.
The chariot archers are wrong, though. The Assyrians were the last to ever use them in the middle east, and I don't think the British celts fought like that. It would have been much more accurate to give them javelins./QUOTE]
Indeed they were effective at disrupting the phalangites. The british tribes would also use the charge to some degree. They would charge through the enemy's lines and throw javelins at them once on their rear. But yes the chariot archer's they had in RTW were complete fantasy. Chariot archers by then hadent been used in century's. For good reason too, the horse archer was for more effective and more agile.
Still egypt was greek by RTW's start date and wasnt "Egyptian" anymore. Having any chariot in there was unhistoric, and was a fantasticly fansiful fantasy.
The medieval period luckily has easier to understand text's and many books. So fewer left field units.
Wine is a bit different, as I am sure even kids will like it.
"Hilary Clinton is the devil"BigTex
~Texas proverb
Bookmarks