Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Pulic Order Problems

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Ranting madman of the .org Senior Member Fly Shoot Champion, Helicopter Champion, Pedestrian Killer Champion, Sharpshooter Champion, NFS Underground Champion Rhyfelwyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hopeless place with no future
    Posts
    8,646

    Default Pulic Order Problems

    I've been playing my first campaign on EB v.74 on VH/H. Playing as the Romani, and its great, but I have a few little things to bring up:

    1. I don't really understand the unit recruitment with relation to governments. I'm not sure, but I though the idea was that Lv.1 Gov't meant you get all your own faction troops, no locals. Lv.2 Gov't meant you get a good selection of your faction troops, but no locals. Lv.3 Gov't meant you get a few faction troops, and local troops. Lv. 4 Gov't meant you got the local troops only. However, in some places with a Homeland goverment I can build local Gallic troops. Also, in other places I can't build anything. In some places with Lv.2 governments, I can only get very low level factions troops. Should this be the case, or is the recruitment system still a WIP?

    2. With the Romani Reform, I need to get better barracks buildings before I can get the new types of Hastati/Principes/Triarii. Is that deliberate?

    3. Its impossible to keep loyalty in many places. I have full stack armies with Generals in places in north Africa which I conquered from Carthage (playing as Romani) and they are still at 70% Public Order with Low Tax rates. Surely a full army should keep order, especially when I always exterminate the populace after conquering a settlement?

    4. Squalor rises incredibly quickly, its causing a lot of my public order problems. As soon as I conquer settlements, it rises by 5% a year. Is this not a bit extreme?

    5. Settlements seem to grow at an incredible rate. Is this hardcoded, or can it be slowed down?

    6. I know you aim to slow down battle speeds, but if you do this through increasing morale, it leads to rather historically inaccurate suicide charges. If anything, should morale not be decreased, so armies rout more realistically perhaps at 30% casualities, and the victors would receive much less serious losses. Would increasing defensive stats further not be a better way to slow down battles?

    I love EB, its a fantastic mod, but I just wanted to raise these little issues...

    Also sorry about the topic title, I was originally just going to talk about the Public Order problem.
    Last edited by Rhyfelwyr; 11-25-2006 at 01:00.
    At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO