Results 1 to 30 of 39

Thread: Merchants and frustrations

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member afrit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    321

    Default Re: Merchants and frustrations

    So does it ever pay-off to move your capital to some corner of the map to maximize the merchant trade? or would the unrest more than offset it?
    The plural of anectode is not data - Anonymous Scientist

    I don't believe in superstition. It brings bad luck. - Umberto Eco

  2. #2
    Guardian of the Fleet Senior Member Shahed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leading the formation!
    Posts
    7,918

    Default Re: Merchants and frustrations

    It depends.

    In my current game as Turks, moving the capital to Caesarea actually maximises the total income by aout 750-850 depending on harvest quality. But I don't yet have merchants in Timbuktu. I'm focusing on monopolising the amber market, first. It's closer and it's only 1100.

    Next will be the iron and gold markets.

    I'm not sure if moving the capital to maximise only trade income would be financially wise. For this empire I am runnning, it would'nt be. Perhaps with high level merchants monopolising gold it would but I'm nt sure.

    One thing I am sure about is that moving the capital to maximise overall income will always be financially wise.
    If you remember me from M:TW days add me on Steam, do mention your org name.

    http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/__shak

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO