I've always wondered at the proposition that one should base their beliefs on reason. After all, this is a belief in itself. A meta-belief perhaps, but a belief nonetheless. How would one go justifying such a belief? Well, we could use reason, but that would be circular and beg the question, wouldn't it? We could call reason a self-evident truth, reason is reasonable perhaps, if one likes tautologies. Or we could just assume reason without a reason. After all, an irrational acceptance of epistemically basic/foundational propositions is necessary for any rational colloquy and reflection. It's all built on irrational foundations.Originally Posted by Aenlic
I like option three best.After all, I'm human. I'm irrational. Yes, I understand reason. I have studied basic logic, and think I have the capacity to understand more advanced forms of the stuff. It's a good tool this logic. But frankly, many of my decisions and beliefs are based on irrational impulse, instinct, and intuition and even though I am quite capable of examining them with reason and rational reflection, I will give way to the former because I feel it to be the better...
Anyway, back to the topic, personally, I remain firmly convinced of the existence of God. It is not due to any argument or evidence, as I have found all three arguments for God's existence to be lacking in someway and I don't like reformed epistemology. It's due to some undeniable...thing...I can't put my finger on. I don't want to say mystical experience, but it is certainly an extremely powerful intuitive phenomena. I find myself being able to deny the existence of material objects much easier than deny God (which is quite amazing, because I am barely able to do the former to begin with).
That being said, the biggest problem lies in which religion to choose...
Bookmarks